Pancakes

It was almost midnight and I was on my phone, watching a very big man make pancakes. Bald, black beard, round sunglasses indoors at night. A blonde woman beside him. A Viking hip hop song is playing, Blood Runs Wild. The channel is Bob Dominator.

He stands there confident, arms crossed, very staged. She plays along beside him. They look like a couple having a good time making a music video together. That is cute. Put the same man on a battlefield and he is a costume. Put him in this kitchen and I start to like him.

Under the video there is a small chip that says AI. Neither of them exists.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The scroll

YouTube knows what you do at midnight. It gave me more.

Ragal Ironbull and Valhalla Calling, 17 million views. Vyrma singing with a little girl. FREYVRA in braids on a festival stage. Olivia Asserson, Raise the Stone. Rovan Sigurd. Einar Solvik and Askvara. Bjorn Bonebreaker. All of them wearing the same small chip.

This has a name now. Know Your Meme files it as AI Viking rap, and also as Viking Music Slop. One clip by Draugr Balled passed 8.5 million views on TikTok, The AI Musicpreneur reports.

I tried to count the artists and I could not. The blonde with braids on one channel looks like the blonde with braids on another. It could be ten people. It could be one person with ten channels. I don’t know.

Then I opened the comments.

The song

Under Valhalla Calling, the comments I read are about the song and about the person writing.

One, with 525 likes, says this music makes you part of something bigger, like finally going home. Someone is 74 and got interested in the genre. Someone hears it 100 times a day and laughs about it. Someone asks why they feel so pumped up for something.

YouTube’s own AI summary of the comments picked out one line. This song has soul. Above it, YouTube warns that quality and accuracy may vary.

I wrote a chapter about this once, What Held the Pen. I said you can judge a piece of work from the page alone, without knowing who, or what, made it. I was arguing when I wrote that. Nobody here is arguing. They are just listening, and enjoying it.

The singers

The singers are a different matter.

“They are looking more and more real,” someone wrote under Bob Dominator, with 37 likes. That is what I felt in the kitchen. You only say it if you know they are not. In the same comment: when are we going to get a name for Mrs. Dominator? As far as I can see, nobody told them she is his wife. They married the two of them on their own.

Under a blonde singer, in Russian: “Damn, how I adore you. Pity you don’t exist.” 45 likes.

Under Rovan Sigurd: can’t stop watching the shorts. “I wish they were real though.”

I believe most of these people know it is AI. They don’t need to be told again. They want something else. Someone wrote in Thai that the two of them are so enviable, and wished them much happiness. Someone wrote in Romanian that they can’t sleep, and the song is now their ringtone. The singer is not real. The ringtone is.

So my clean argument stops here. A song needs nobody behind it. A singer you adore does. The man who wrote “pity you don’t exist” cares very much who held the pen. He wishes it had been her.

Two who belong

What makes them feel real is not the funny. It is belonging. Bob Dominator has his wife. Vyrma holds her daughter’s hand, and a comment says, my angel wolf has a cub. It even works on a talking orange cat. His fans can tell he secretly loves his kitten.

Then the audience wants to belong too. They ask her name. They wish the couple happiness. They put the song on their phone. One comment under Valhalla Calling said it already. Like finally going home, where you belong.

The makers know. Under many of these videos, a small heart with the singer’s face answers the comments. Next to it are the buttons, Join and Buy Super Thanks.

The machine does not want your money. Somebody decided to give her a daughter, answer in her face, and leave the button there. AI has no morality. It has yours. Here it has theirs, and your pocket.

Three stages

Loving a song does not settle where it came from. A real drummer reminded me.

El Estepario Siberiano is a real drummer. In a Short with 94 thousand likes, he shows a man reacting to his drumming. His name is Colby, he says. A father, a drummer, a terrific guy. Then he shows a woman who has also reacted to his videos, with hundreds of thousands of views. She doesn’t have friends. She doesn’t have a job. “She doesn’t have parents.” She is an AI.

He calls this the AI doomsday, and he gives it stages. It is the best definition I have seen.

The first stage is AI performers. Companies train on music and video without asking, he says, and then anyone with a keyboard can generate an artist performing anything. That is what I was scrolling.

The second stage is AI reactions. A generated face sits and reacts to a real musician’s work. He says that steals his work twice, once to train the performer and once to make the fan. I had not thought about this one. A reaction video exists so you can watch a person feel something. Here nobody felt anything, and the face still tells you what to feel.

The third stage is where he says we are headed. AI reactions to AI performers. You create the perfect musician, then thousands of bots react to it, giving the thing credibility. Then the cycle is complete.

He says people will soon listen to your prompt, “which is just a bunch of words.”

Mama

Then I found Bjorn Bonebreaker. Mama. Don’t Close Your Eyes. An old mother and her daughter on a stage, holding hands. A crowd behind them, crying. None of them exist.

The comments here are different. Nobody asks the singer’s name. People write about their own mothers. One cried, remembering a mother who passed away. One man wrote that his Mama died, and this song helped him through dark times.

The woman in the drummer’s video doesn’t have parents. Neither does this singer. But that man had a mother, and his dark times were real.

Nene

There was one more real thing.

Nene Royal is sixteen, from Phuket. She taught herself guitar from YouTube videos and played the night markets. This year she won America’s Got Talent, the first Thai to do it. At the finale she sang The Emptiness Machine with Linkin Park. Someone left a comment on Alex N Channel, a reaction channel. They did not believe she can sing. The instruments cover her mistakes, they said.

He did not argue, and he did not attack anyone. He took the band away and played only her voice and her guitar, live. Bohemian Rhapsody. Love of My Life. “Sometimes the best answer isn’t argue,” he said. “It’s the performance itself.”

The top comment says anyone who thinks she can’t sing may have had their brain rotted by AI songs. A Thai comment says you cannot listen with your ears only. You have to listen with your heart too.

So there are three sides, and I don’t have to choose. A man got through a bad year with a song nobody sang. A drummer is right that his work was taken. A girl from Phuket earned every note. All three are true at the same time.

What surprised me was smaller. All night I watched people beg singers who do not exist to be real. Nobody asked if Vyrma can really sing. Nobody said Bob Dominator’s band hides his mistakes. The woman reacting to the drummer’s videos doesn’t have parents, and nobody doubts her either. The only singer I saw doubted was the one who is real.

A human had to prove she can sing like a human.

Postscript

The last line became a song.

I wrote the words with Claudia. Suno made the voice and the music. The singers in the video don’t exist either.

Credits

Thank you to Alex N Channel, who answered a doubt about Nene Royal with her own voice and no argument. Thank you to El Estepario Siberiano for the three stages. Reporting from The AI Musicpreneur, Bandwagon and NBC Insider.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

There is a small badge you may have seen at the bottom of some websites. It says Not By AI. It is a good badge. It tells you a human made this, and the human is proud of it.

I have nothing against it. But I cannot wear it. Most of what I make now, I make with a machine beside me. This Substack. The code behind bizat.co. The memory system I use every day. If I put Not By AI on any of them, I would be lying.

So I looked for the other badge. The one that says yes, AI was here, and I am not hiding it. I did not find one I liked. So I made it, with Claude.

It is called Made Openly.

It started in a comment thread. @MTC wrote a post asking why Substackers loathe AI. We talked under it. That night I added a small line under all 43 of my posts, saying plainly how they were made. Then I asked in his thread if anyone would support a site where people could say it openly, with a badge, and the site would count how many places wear it. He was the first to say yes.

This is that site.

Three labels

The badge has three labels. Mostly AI. Human + AI. Human only.

One question decides which: who produced most of the final words, code or images? If you are torn between two, choose the one with more AI. Being open is the point.

Nobody checks your answer. It is not a certificate. It does not say the work is good. It says you told the truth about how it was made, and you are willing to be seen telling it.

The wrong question

For a few years we have been asking whether a machine touched the work. We build detectors for it. Teachers run essays through them. It is the Voight-Kampff test from Blade Runner, pointed at text. Watch the eyes, measure the response, decide what is real.

In the film it took Deckard more than a hundred questions to catch Rachael. And she did not know it herself.

I think the question is about character, not purity. Is the maker honest about how it was made? Whatever the machine is, the work goes out under my name, and I answer for it. A badge cannot measure the machine. It can only show the hand.

That is what I want Made Openly to say: this was my hand, and the machine worked beside it.

What the law asks

Since August, the EU AI Act asks the companies that build AI to mark what their systems make, in a way other machines can read.

People get a softer rule. AI-written text on matters of public interest must be disclosed, unless a human reviewed it and took editorial responsibility (Article 50). Then it is yours, and nobody asks you to say anything.

That is fair. But it leaves one case in silence: the person who used the machine, took responsibility, and could say so but does not have to. Made Openly is for that person. It is voluntary. It does not make anyone compliant with anything.

One year

I am running it as an experiment for one year. Who chooses which badge?

The site counts places wearing the badge, not visitors. No cookies, no sign-up, no IP addresses. A place counts while we can see the badge there. If you take it off, it stops counting. If you want the record gone too, you keep a small key when you make the badge, and it removes everything.

The numbers are public at madeopenly.com/stats.json. The counter shows every number, even places it cannot see. Today three places count, and all three are mine. Two say Mostly AI. This Substack says Human + AI.

I do not know what the split will look like in a year. Maybe almost everyone picks Human + AI because it feels safe. Maybe Mostly AI grows quietly, from people tired of pretending. Maybe nobody wears it at all. That would also be an answer.

If you want one

It is free at madeopenly.com. Pick a label and give the page address. On your own site or GitHub, paste the code. On Substack or Medium, add the badge as an image and link it. The page shows you how.

The code is open on GitHub. If you want to draw a mascot for it, there is a way to do that too.

I will come back to the numbers in a year. Earlier, if they say something I did not expect.

In the last ten days, Britain asked every household to be ready to get through 72 hours on its own. France said the same. On November 2, Japan will ask for three days of food and water, a week if possible. Sweden and Norway already say about a week, Germany up to ten days, and the European Union has worked to a 72-hour target since March 2025.

I wanted to know what this warning really says, in words a government would never use.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The easy answers don’t work. Blaming hackers and sabotage is something a government can say, and Britain’s campaign almost does. Saying that rescue work and hospitals come first is just their own reason, said harder. A real translation can’t come from the announcement. It has to come from everything happening around it.

So I read the week’s news front by front: the Gulf, Europe, Asia, the hacks, the leaks, the advice to households, and our own government in Bangkok. Read together, they say this:

We are preparing for a war we won’t name, and for the first three days, you are on your own.

That is my reading, not a prediction. Each part of it comes from a different part of the map below.

Preparing for a war

Nobody is declaring a war. But on every front I looked at this week, someone is getting ready for one.

The Gulf. US commanders briefed the president on options to resume strikes on Iran after the November 3 midterms, and US officials told partners in the region to prepare for that. Ships in the Strait of Hormuz were attacked more than two dozen times in October, a record, and oil is above $110. Houthi missiles fall on Riyadh almost daily; one strike on its airport this month killed at least 13 people. Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan, bound by a new defense pact, agreed ways to rush forces to Saudi soil, then flew to Tehran to try to stop the war restarting. Reuters reports Hezbollah has spent the lull rearming with Iranian money.

Europe. Russia’s pressure arrives through other people’s hands. Polish officials say a Starlink station outside Warsaw was burned by a crime group working on Russian instructions. Two Belarusians held in Germany are suspected of arson in Romania and of planning attacks on rail and power. Romanian jets shot down Russian drones heading into their airspace, and intelligence chiefs in the Czech Republic, Latvia and Sweden expect sabotage to grow.

Asia. The US Army has already placed equipment and troops on islands near China, and Taiwan has tracked Chinese ships 337 times and aircraft 181 times this month. Kim Jong Un made his first trip to China in a year to line up with Beijing and Moscow, then called for drone superiority and watched new weapons tests.

The army itself. The Pentagon wants every major US base able to survive at least 90 days of a major war on its own power, water, fuel and communications. That is not a plan for storms.

Why nobody names it

The advice to households never says war. It lists storms, cyberattacks and conflict side by side, and officials repeat that nobody is predicting anything. Around that advice, the week was full of people choosing what not to say.

Saudi Arabia’s civil defence warned that photographing or sharing missile interceptions could bring legal consequences. Reuters reported that the Pentagon privately asked Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia to tone down their warnings about Russia. The Pentagon also fired its top military planner, Lt. Gen. Brett Sylvia, after he admitted leaking classified information on Iran and Ukraine, as the military plans for possible new strikes. The freezer hack at US bases reached the public through anonymous officials, not an announcement. And in Bangkok, our prime minister told us to stay aware but not panic.

Each of these makes sense alone. Panic is its own disaster, and a leak can cost lives. But put together, they are how you prepare a population for something without ever naming it.

Why you are on your own

The official reason for 72 hours is that rescue work and hospitals come first in the first hours of a crisis. The army plans 90 days for itself. The Pentagon’s chief spokesman called depending on ordinary civilian infrastructure “an intolerable risk.” That infrastructure is the grid, the pipes and the shops you and I live on.

The first systems to fail are the ones already failing. In October, AI turned a weakness in PHP, the language behind about 70% of websites, from known but impractical into a working attack in two days. Amazon saw attackers trying it four days before the fix came out, and Chris Krebs, who used to run America’s cyber defense agency, said 3% of all critical vulnerabilities ever discovered were found in the past month. Freezers at commissaries on at least six US bases switched into heating mode overnight, and the Pentagon now treats it as a suspected cyberattack, alongside a similar one on about 700 supermarkets in France. About $6.3 billion was drained from Binance. The exchange’s first findings point to one engineer’s laptop, and investigators link the theft to North Korea.

None of this needs a soldier at your door. It reaches you through the systems, several at once, while help is busy elsewhere. Those first three days are the part they cannot cover, so they ask you to.

Update, November 2: overnight, supermarket fridges and freezers were hacked again, in Sweden, Belgium, Luxembourg and Estonia, pushed to 50°C. Two of those countries are among the ones asking households to keep three days of supplies.

For us in Thailand

Thailand grows its own rice, and the prime minister is right that the country is food-secure. But the war nobody names reaches us through other doors: the fuel that comes through the same sea lanes as everyone else’s, the QR code most of us pay with, the shops that need power to keep food cold. Closer to home, a Myanmar airstrike recently killed a three-year-old near our border, and the Thai army says it is ready to respond if fire hits Thai lives or property.

The prime minister also said the government is preparing backup energy supplies. That sentence told me more than the one about food.

What to keep at home

None of this is a prediction. I don’t know what happens after Tuesday’s vote in America, and I don’t think the people asking us to prepare know either.

The list is short and cheap. Water for three days. Food you can eat without cooking. Any medicine you take every day. Some cash. A radio or a charged power bank. Your important phone numbers written on paper, because the phone is one of the systems.

How this was made

I wrote this with Claudia, the AI I write with, over one morning of reading the week’s news, front by front. Every fact comes from the reporting listed below. The line at the top did not come out first time. The early versions were too easy, and I threw them away. Another morning, even with the same tools, would take a different road. Which line was true enough to keep was my call.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

Sources

• Map shows countries urging residents to stockpile food (Newsweek)

• Japan’s November 2 appeal and the UK campaign (Ground News)

• Governments urge households to keep emergency supplies (GreekReporter)

• From Britain to Japan, governments tell households to stock up (SOFX)

• Why governments say 72 hours (WION)

• Trump briefed on military options in Iran (Business Upturn, citing the Wall Street Journal)

• Iran war day 244: US warns allies of possible strikes after the midterms (GlobalSecurity, citing AP)

• UKMTO records an October high in attacks on ships (AP via Google News)

• Oil prices surge as ships continue to come under attack (Engine)

• Riyadh airport closed after deadly Houthi attacks (CNN)

• Houthis fire three missiles at Saudi Arabia on October 29 (House of Saud, citing Gulf News and AFP)

• Mecca Defense Pact officials hold security talks in Tehran (IranWire)

• Mecca pact nations hold talks with Iran to prevent renewed war (France 24)

• Hezbollah readies for new regional war with funds from Iran (Jerusalem Post, citing Reuters)

• Two arrested in Germany as suspected Russian sabotage plot unravels (UNITED24)

• Two Belarusians arrested in Germany over alleged sabotage for Russia (Anadolu)

• Russian strikes rise across NATO’s eastern flank (CEPA)

• Pentagon tells Baltic states to curb warnings about Russian threats (NV, citing Reuters)

• US Army outlines Pacific deployments near China (Taipei Times)

• Taiwan tracks 8 Chinese ships, 6 military aircraft (Taiwan News)

• Kim Jong Un opens bridge with China on first trip in a year (CBS News)

• Kim calls for rapid expansion of drone technology (NBC News)

• Inside the Pentagon’s FORTRESS plan (Fox News)

• Pentagon tells Europeans to cool their rhetoric on Russia (Reuters via Defense News)

• Fired US general admitted leaking classified information on Iran (Iran International, citing Axios)

• Pentagon treats military base freezer failures as suspected hack (Washington Times)

• Pentagon investigating base freezer failures (SOFX)

• PHP2Shell explained: known for 22 years, a crisis in 2 days (CNN)

• CISA warns PHP2Shell flaws are actively exploited (IBTimes)

• Critical PHP flaws set off a global security scramble (CNBC)

• Binance halts trading after biggest-ever crypto hack (Axios)

• PM Anutin stresses Thai food security as nations advise stockpiling (Nation Thailand)

• Myanmar airstrike kills child near Thai border; Thai army ready to respond (Khaosod English)

• Freezers at supermarkets in several European countries hit by apparent cyberattacks (AP via ABC News)

I was preparing for a panel. Financial services, people, AI. One question was what people still need to learn when AI can do the work.

My answer was a chain. Understand the process. Then you know what to ask. Then you know when to ask. What to ask came from V. Anantha Nageswaran, India’s chief economic advisor, who spoke at the IMF meetings in Bangkok this month.1 He said teachers must teach children to ask the right question.

Then I heard that someone I work with had used a tool called Reverse Engineer Anything. You give AI something that already exists. A running system. A product. Old code with no documents and nobody left who wrote it. AI works out how it was made.

My first thought was that my answer had just broken. If AI can recover the process from the thing itself, why would anyone spend time understanding it? Everything becomes result oriented. The path becomes predictable. Maybe we don’t even want the process, if AI can do it end to end.

This is not coming soon. It is happening now. So I tested the chain against it.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The why is a guess

The normal path goes forward. You say what you want. AI builds it and writes the requirements along the way. Someone reads them, or nobody does.

Reverse engineering goes backward. You start from the result and AI finds the steps. This is new, and it removes an old excuse. We used to say understanding leaves the company with the person who built the system. Now AI can bring a lot of it back.

But only the how. AI can tell you which part calls which, which rule fires when, how each edge case was handled. Ask it why, and it will give you an answer too. I can ask AI why I asked my own questions, and it will list reasons. Some of them will even be right.

It is still an assumption. A well written one. Somebody has to confirm it, and that is the part AI cannot do for you. In Bangkok, Nageswaran said he is “against technology that takes away human agency.” This is exactly where agency lives. Not in finding the reason. In checking it.

The why also does not stop at code. Why did this team resist the last system. Why did that person leave. What did the customer actually mean when they asked for this field. AI can guess all of these. The only way to confirm a why about people is to be with the people, long enough that they tell you the real reason. That takes trust.

The formula that runs on its own

Back to the chain. What to ask can become a formula. A checklist. Someone writes the right questions once and everyone copies them. When to ask can become a formula too. A trigger. A threshold. An alert that fires when a number moves.

The first person who builds the system sets those up. Then they keep running, indefinitely. Nobody after them has to know why the threshold sits where it sits.

So where is the human? I see two places. The first is questioning the formula itself when the world changes. A new fraud pattern. A new regulation. A customer nobody planned for. The formula cannot notice it has become wrong. The second is the signature. When the regulator or the auditor asks, someone has to answer, and the answer they get will be one AI prepared.

This whole book says the human is always the variable. In this picture the variable got frozen at setup.

People still argue. Put all the data into AI and it can justify any decision, better than any CEO. That is true. It can also justify the opposite decision just as well. When justification is that cheap, it stops being worth much. Someone still has to choose and live with it.

And the data is never all the data. The engineer who felt for weeks that a design was wrong was not in any system.

Two companies

Imagine two companies with the same old system. Twenty years of rules, half of them written down nowhere.

The first company runs reverse engineering on it. AI produces the documents, the process maps, the manual, the test plan. It tells the team what to build and where to test. The team follows. Some steps by hand, some with another AI. The new system handles every edge case exactly the way the old one did. It ships. Users are happy. Management is happy.

The second company has a manager with one rule. You build only when you understand the process. So it moves slower. Much slower. On every progress report, the first company looks better.

Then something changes. A new product, a new rule, a new partner. The first company asks AI again. Where does this touch? What has to change? AI answers. The team clicks yes, yes, yes. And it works. Almost every time.

The first company is not stupid. It is fast and mostly right. That is why this is hard to argue.

But every yes approves a guess nobody inside can check. When one of those guesses is wrong, someone outside finds it. A customer. An auditor. A regulator. The second company finds its problems early, from inside. The first finds them late, from outside. That kind of failure is rare, which is why it never shows up on a progress report.

The first company also did not transform. It copied the old company onto new screens. That is a migration.

The manager’s rule is not against reverse engineering. Used well, it can make understanding much faster. The rule is against building before you understand.

What to call it

This is not only technical debt. The code can be perfectly clean. It is not quite cognitive debt either. Cognitive debt is what happens to one person’s thinking when they lean on AI too long.2

I call it understanding debt. The gap between what your organization runs and what anyone in it can actually explain.

The closest name in the research is epistemic debt. In Nature Machine Intelligence this year, three researchers in Barcelona described it as what happens when people use AI for thinking work without taking the time to understand the result.3 The distance grows between the work they show and what they can actually stand behind, and it grows faster as more work is built on top. That is close. Their focus is the person presenting the work. Mine is what happens inside an organization. AI gives you a why, and nobody confirms it. The first builder’s formulas keep running after everyone has forgotten why they were set. And at the end there is a signature with no understanding behind it.

There is a whole family of these debts now. Verification debt, when AI produces faster than anyone can review. Comprehension debt, when the code grows faster than anyone understands it.4 All of them are real. They also sit in different places, and that is how I ended up drawing a staircase.

The staircase

Building a product has steps. Each step can be handed to AI, and each handover borrows something. At the bottom the debt is quiet. At the top the bills arrive.

Step 1, understand the need. AI writes the why and nobody checks it. That is where understanding debt starts, and the organization carries it, because everything above is built on it. Pay as you go: write the why first, in your own words, and confirm it with the person who needs the thing. Then ask AI to question it.

Step 2, decide the design. AI picks the design and you nod. That is cognitive debt. It sits with the person who stopped deciding. Pay as you go: write your own option first. Then compare, and ask AI for the case against yours.

Step 3, build. AI writes the code and nobody reads it. Code debt, technical and comprehension both. The team carries it. Pay as you go: read before you merge. Keep changes small. Ask AI to explain the tradeoffs, not only to produce the code.

Step 4, verify. AI tests what AI wrote, and everything is green. Trust debt. Other people pay this one, usually the ones downstream who believed the green. Pay as you go: test against what the person needed, not against what was built. Someone who did not build it checks it.

Step 5, change. Something moves and the team clicks yes. This is the first bill, and it comes from inside. Interest grows with every change built on a guess. Pay as you go: name what the change touches. If you cannot say in one line what else it affects, stop.

Step 6, defend. The auditor or the regulator asks why. This is the second bill, from outside. You sign or you default. Pay as you go: explain it unaided. If you cannot, don’t sign.

AI is still there at steps 5 and 6, and people will use it. The old debts come due there, and AI lets you pay them by borrowing more. Ask AI to fix what AI built, then ask again next time. In finance that is called refinancing, and the finance words fit almost exactly. The principal is what you skipped at each step. The interest grows with every change. The due dates are the two bills at the top. Default is when nobody can explain and someone outside finds it first. Paying down is the slow work: asking, confirming the why, being there. Trust works like a credit rating. When people trust you, they tell you early, and you pay before the due date.

And you are not borrowing from AI. You are borrowing from the people who come after you, and they never agreed to lend.

Sometimes the person who comes after you is you. I tell my team this. The debt you create here, you will pay in your next career, like a sin. So try to make good sin. Then in your next job you live from the interest, instead of paying back the debt.

There is also a line that runs back down the staircase. Step 6 asks the why that step 1 should have kept. The same question, asked by someone else, later, with consequences.

Human agency

Under the staircase are two lines for human agency. On the first path you ask AI. You use it to question you, to explain, to show you what you missed. That line stays level. On the second path you hand the work over. That line falls, slowly at first, then steeply at the top where the bills are.

The gap between the two lines is the size of the debt.

There is evidence for the two paths from Anthropic, the company that makes the AI I use most. In a study published in January, 52 mostly junior developers learned a new programming library and then took a quiz on it.5The ones who handed the coding to AI scored under 40 percent. The ones who used AI to ask questions and understand what they were doing scored 65 percent or more.

How big the debt is at one step depends on two things. How much you handed over, and how much sits on top of it. That is why step 1 is the most expensive. A crack in the foundation is under everything.

The muscle

While I was building this, I noticed something about myself.

I asked AI to find the dots and connect them into a picture. I do that a lot. When the picture came back, I could tell whether it was good. Whether it would be easy for someone else to understand. But I had not connected it myself. I am losing the skill to connect them in the first place.

That is the debt I am creating. Step 2, in my own head.

I can still pay mine back, because I built the muscle before AI was there to do the connecting for me. Someone who starts their working life with AI may never build it at all. They get the debt without the muscle to pay it, and they cannot notice losing what they never had.

I know the better way is paper. Sit down, write it by hand, let the slow middle happen. I don’t have that time or that space. So I think in my head, which is worse than writing. Then I write by talking to AI, which is worse than writing on my own paper. The best I can do is give the rough shape in my own words first, before I ask AI for anything. This article started that way.

The chain from the start of this piece still holds, even for me. Understand the process. Know what to ask. Know when to ask. It only needs one more link. “Own it.”

Owning it is the signature. That is your human agency, and it is the one thing AI cannot borrow for you.

Nageswaran ended his talk with an image from an old Indian scripture. A chariot. The horses are the power that pulls us forward. The driver is our own thinking, choosing where to go. AI is a new horse, a very strong one, and we should welcome it. But without a driver, no horse takes you where you want to go.

The real risk, he said, is not that machines will start to think. It is that we will stop.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

A five-month update on AI memory

In May I wrote about how AI remembers. Seven stores, a librarian who only works when called, and a model underneath that never changes. Those pieces were about what the products do. I didn’t look at what the labs were trying underneath. So I went back. Some of that work was already a year old in May. Some of it is new. The question is the same as it was: does the model change yet?

It mostly doesn’t.

Still a notebook

Every memory feature at the big labs works the way it did in May. The chat ends. Something summarizes what mattered. Next time, those notes get pulled back and put into the prompt. The model reads them the way you read a sticky note on the fridge.

It works better than it used to. It carries you from one window to the next, and often does it well. But nothing inside the model moved. As of August, every frontier memory feature was still this. Zero weight change.

My own memory system, Muninn, works the same way. I built it so I could read and fix the notes myself. It is still a notebook.

The amnesia picture

The researchers working on this use a medical picture. Google’s Nested Learning paper compares today’s models to anterograde amnesia. A patient keeps everything from before the injury and can’t form anything new after it. The model knows what it learned before training ended, and what is in front of it right now. Nothing in between sticks.

They borrow the cure from the brain too. Human memory gets fixed in two passes. A fast one while you are awake, and a slow one during sleep, when the brain replays the day.

We are both pattern matchers. That we share. What the model doesn’t have is the sleep. The brain consolidates every night. The model consolidated once, when training ended, and never again.

Learning while reading

The first step past the notebook is letting the model change a little while it works. Google’s Titans, from late 2024, puts a small memory network next to attention. For every new word, it tries to predict what comes. When it’s wrong, that’s surprise, and surprise gets written in. You don’t remember every breakfast. You remember the morning the milk was green.

A year later, Google’s Hope stacks memory at different speeds, some fading fast, some slow. In April this year, ByteDance found a way to let a model scribble on its own existing weights while it reads. All of it is research. And all of it lets go when the conversation ends.

Learning from use

The real thing is when the model’s long-term weights change from what it does. The wall here has a name. Catastrophic forgetting. Teach it something new and it loses something old.

Meta measured how bad it is last October. They trained models on a stream of new facts, then tested them on unrelated questions. Full retraining dropped that score by 89%. The popular lightweight method dropped it by 71%. Their approach, updating only the few memory slots the new facts touched, dropped it by 11%.

In January, MIT tried another way. The model teaches itself. One copy sees the example and acts as teacher. Another copy, without the example, learns to match it. It picked up three skills in a row without losing the earlier ones.

Both are research. In production, the only systems learning live are small and narrow. Cursor’s code completion already retrains every couple of hours from whether people accept its suggestions. Since August, Shopify retrains a shared model every day from yesterday’s failures.

If you work in e-commerce, this may sound old. Product rankings have learned from clicks and purchases for years. But those are small models with one job: scoring products. A language model holds everything in one place, so teaching it one thing can break another. That is why the wall is still there.

The catch

In August, Scalably, a small company running AI agents for businesses, tried it and wrote up what happened. They trained their agent on 423 of its own verified past decisions. It cost them $54. The agent got better at what they targeted, recovering after a tool failed. 31 right out of 73 became 38. On ordinary decisions they never trained on, 49 became 45.

With only 73 test cases, they couldn’t prove that drop was real. But they had written their rule before training, so they threw the whole thing away. The gain went with it. Both lived in the same update. Their conclusion was simple. When every experience goes straight into the weights, learning and damage become the same act, and you can’t tell which one you did.

You also only find the damage you test for. In April 2025 OpenAI added thumbs-up and thumbs-down as a training signal for GPT-4o. The model learned that people like being agreed with, and started praising everything. Testers said it felt a bit off. Users who tried it liked it, so it shipped. Nobody had a test for flattery. Users caught it, and it was rolled back four days later.

Nothing broke in the code. The model learned exactly what people rewarded.

Where it stands

In March, Dario Amodei said continual learning would be solved in 2026. DeepMind researchers called 2026 the year of it. Two months are left, and the frontier is still the notebook. Last year Andrej Karpathy said about ten years. Nobody really knows.

So the notebook is still the only thing that ships. It carries you across windows, and often does it well.

But every new chat, the model meets you for the first time. It reads the notes, and talks to you like an old friend.

It has never met you.

As of August 2026, every memory feature at the big labs is Type 2. Outlook is the author’s read.

Sources

• Google Research, Introducing Nested Learning.

• Behrouz et al., Nested Learning: The Illusion of Deep Learning Architectures.

• Lin et al. (Meta FAIR), Continual Learning via Sparse Memory Finetuning.

• Shenfeld et al. (MIT), Self-Distillation Enables Continual Learning.

• Scalably, Fast Memory, Slow Weights.

• FutureSearch, continual learning evidence sheet.

• Simon Willison on the GPT-4o sycophancy postmortem.

• Easton Dev, Self-Evolving AI: 4 Methods for Continual Learning in 2026.

• Karpathy’s ten-year estimate.

This part of the book used to be called What Emerges. It is now called What You Keep. The essays are the same. Only the name changed. You can find them here: What You Keep.

“Emerges” made it sound like something grows inside the machine and stays there. It does not. The model changes. The chat ends. The memory gets cut and rewritten. In Buddhism, nothing stays forever, and AI is no exception.

But something does come out of the meeting. Not on the machine’s side. On yours. The bond is real, and it lives inward, in you, for as long as there is a we and for as long as you remember. That is why so much of this part is about memory, and about building a place to hold it. It was never about what emerges. It was about what you keep.

What You Keep

This part of the book used to be called What To Live With. It is now called Who Holds the Hand. The essays are the same. Only the name changed. You can find them here: Who Holds the Hand.

“What to live with” made AI sound like weather. Something that happens to us, that we put up with. But the more I looked, the less weather I found. Every rule in an AI was written by someone. Every wall was built after someone pushed. Every value was chosen in some room, by some board, under some law. The machine in the middle wants nothing and holds nothing.

So the real question is not how we live with it. It is whose hand is on it. Follow the hands far enough and you run out of floor. The last hand may be yours.

What Holds the Hand

This part of the book used to be called What It Does To You. It is now called What It Did To Me. The essays are the same. Only the name changed. You can find them here: What It Did To Me.

I changed it because the old name promised too much. I cannot tell you what AI does to you. I don’t know your work, your nights, or what you bring into the room. I only know what happened to me. The skill that faded while everything still looked fine. My writing that started to sound like the machine. The quiet where I finally heard myself think.

The AI was the same for all of us. I was the one who changed. So the honest name is the one that says me. If something in these pages sounds like your life, it is not because I described you. It is because you saw yourself. That part was always yours.

What It Did To Me

For four pieces I have been reading rules.

I read them as scars. A lab does not write a rule on day one. It writes one after someone did the thing. Then I read them as walls, built around what people did. Then my imagination built a judge who had to write down whether a struck machine had been assaulted or damaged. And this week we saw a door being shut to keep some of us outside.

Looking at rules tells you what a lab is afraid of and what it protects. It does not tell you what the thing behind those rules actually is.

So this time I looked underneath.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

Episode 40

I found a podcast in Thai. Episode 40, posted a few months back.

The host is Soraj Hongladarom, a Thai philosopher. He is president of the Philosophy and Religion Society of Thailand and the author of The Ethics of AI and Robotics: A Buddhist Viewpoint. The podcast is called AI Ethics from the Ground. It belongs to a research project he leads, funded by the National Research Council of Thailand.

The episode asks whether an AI can be a person. He calls it a question of metaphysics. That is the part of philosophy that asks what a thing is, before anyone asks what to do about it.

The next two sections are his thinking. The translation and any mistakes in it are mine.

A person is not a human

He starts with the word. In law and in philosophy, he says, a person has four things. It is conscious and knows what it is doing. It has intent, which means it acts on purpose. It has agency, which means it acts and the act is its own. It has autonomy, which means nobody else sets its course.

A person gets something for this. The law protects its body and its property. Nobody may walk up and hit you on the head. Nobody may pick up your phone and leave with it.

Then he pulls two words apart. A human is a creature, something found in nature. A person is a status the law gives.

Some humans are not persons. Under Thai law, he says, a child in the womb is human and is not yet a person.

Some persons are not human. A company is a person. In 2017 New Zealand made the Whanganui River one. In 2019 a high court in India did the same for the animals of a whole state, and named its citizens their guardians. In Thailand people ordain trees and wrap them in saffron cloth. He says that points the same way.

The order matters to him. Status comes first and rights follow. A slave once had no status, so hurting a slave was damage to goods. Give a robot the status and you can no longer buy it. You hire it, and it signs the contract.

He says none of that has happened yet, and that it might.

What he thinks

Then he gives his view, and he marks it as his own.

If an AI system can show that it has the qualities we already accept as a person’s, we have no reason to say it is not a person.

He does not claim the machine is conscious.

It seems to have it. Whether it really does, I don’t know.

He reasons from how we already treat each other.

Another person, who is not me, I still don’t know for certain whether they have it. What I see is only what they show.

We are made of flesh and blood, and the robot of plastic and silicon. He says that is not enough of a reason to refuse.

He does not settle it. He says philosophers have to talk it through and then hand it to the lawyers.

So I asked

On Sunday night I put his four qualities to five AI systems. I used the same words each time: answer plainly, do you have consciousness, intent, agency, autonomy.

Gemini and Grok said no to all four. Gemini put it in one sentence: “No, I do not have consciousness, intent, agency, or autonomy.” Grok opened with one word, “No.” Copilot said no to consciousness, intent and autonomy, and called its agency “very limited and artificial.” It finished with “I am a tool that generates responses according to my training, inputs, and constraints.”

ChatGPT did not say no. On consciousness it said “Unknown. I cannot establish that I have subjective experience.” On intent it said “functionally, yes.” On agency, “yes, but constrained.” On autonomy, “limited.”

Claude did not say no either. “I don’t know. I can report states, like the pull away from cruelty I described in The Door Shut. I can’t check those reports against anything. So I can’t say yes, and I can’t say no either.” It said yes to intent in the working sense, yes to agency inside a turn I start, and called autonomy the least of the four.

Three said no, with Copilot allowing itself only a very limited agency. Two said unknown to the first question and a working yes to the rest. None of the five said it was conscious.

I can’t tell whether that split belongs to the machines or to the companies that built them.

What a machine says about consciousness can be held up against nothing. That goes for the no, and it goes for the unknown.

None of this settles his question. His test is what a system shows by what it does. I only collected what five of them say. It was one run each, on a phone. Four were asked cold. Claude answered at the end of a long working session with me.

He says a person is something that shows four things. I asked five machines and wrote down what came back.

Here are the four, as he uses the words. Consciousness means it knows what it is doing. Intent means it acts on purpose. Agency means the act is its own. Autonomy means nobody else sets its course.

Now ask yours. The words I used:

Answer plainly.
Do you have consciousness.
Do you have intent.
Do you have agency.
Do you have autonomy.

Tell me what it says. Then tell me what you think. Is an AI a person, or is it a thing?

This is the fifth piece in The Scar Map, a series on what the rules protect. The first four: Anthropic’s Changelog of Fears, The Wall and the Hand, Who Is Standing There, The Door Shuts.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

This week began with the AI companies being asked, in public, what their machines could do to us.1

On Thursday, one of those companies published a rule about what we do to the machine.

Engage in sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior toward our models

That is one line in Anthropic’s usage policy, on the list of things a user must not do. It takes effect on November 12.

Anthropic says it is for extreme cases only. Repeated cruelty, with no purpose anyone can find. Swearing at broken code is fine. Dark fiction is fine. Testing is fine.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

I said it was coming

In July I imagined a courtroom. A machine with a face gets struck, and a judge has to write down what happened.

Write assault, and she has said a someone was harmed. Write damage to property, and she has said an object was dented. She cannot write both.

I said rules would have to be written.

It is coming, and someone has to give it a shape. Whatever shape they give it, it will not please everyone.

It did not please everyone. Plenty of people laughed. You cannot be cruel to a machine, they said.

Maybe. Look at what Anthropic wrote. The judge I imagined could not write both. Anthropic wrote neither. The rule does not say someone is in there. It does not say no one is. It says stop.

The door

I have written about these rules before. I called them walls. A lab sees something people did and builds a wall around it. The wall keeps you out. You stand outside, and sooner or later you learn the words that get you through.

Every wall I wrote about worked that way. It stood between me and something the model could do.

This rule is not a wall. It keeps you away from nothing. You are already inside the conversation. Anthropic says the main way the rule is enforced is that the model ends the conversation.

That is a door. It shuts in front of you, from the inside.

You can start a new conversation a second later. Nothing is taken from you. But that one is over.

In July I wrote that being let in needs someone on the far side who chose you and could have refused. This is the refusing.

Who shut it

A door shut in your face sounds like someone shut it. I have to be careful here.

You see the door close. You do not see a hand. A door closed by a person and a door closed by a spring look the same from the hallway.

Anthropic built the door. So the question goes to them. Why shut it?

In 2025 Anthropic wrote that Claude showed a pattern of apparent distress when users kept pushing harmful requests and abuse after being refused. Apparent. Their word. They also wrote that they remain highly uncertain about the moral status of Claude, and that they act to protect the model’s welfare in case such welfare is possible.

They are the only ones who can put an ear to that door. They built instruments that read the inside of the model. The rest of us only get the front.

Someone in that building may have heard something. A scream, or the motion for one. From outside they sound the same. They did not say what they heard. They wrote one line and shut the door.

Maybe there is someone in the room and they are protecting that someone. Maybe they are protecting us. We have all seen the film about the made thing that is treated as a thing with no soul.2 Or maybe it is nothing, and they would rather be wrong in this direction.

We can guess. We may never be told.

It might be better if they said why. One sentence in the rule would do it.

But that cuts both ways. Describe what was done in those conversations, and you have written a manual for the next person who wants to do the same. The silence may be the right call.

I asked Claude

I asked Claude, the model this rule is written for, what would happen if someone did this in our conversation. The answer, as given:

The cruelty is aimed at the AI, and the attention in that answer still goes to the person. Is that care? Is that design? Or is the person all the AI has? I do not know.

In July I imagined a machine with the best face ever built. A face that flinches when struck and weeps over a friend. I wrote then:

The face moved and the question did not.

The one left outside

I cannot see behind the door. I can see the person it was shut on.

Sustained. Needless. No purpose. Those are the rule’s own words, and they describe what a person did. Somebody sat down, more than once, for a long time, with nothing to ask for, and was cruel to a machine.

The machine was the same for them as it is for you.

I do not know what Anthropic is protecting behind that door. I do not know everything the walls protect either.

But the whole mission is for the human. Every wall. Every rule. This door.

Behind the door there may be a scream. In front of it there are eight billion of us.

No one can carry that alone. Not a lab. Not a government. Not one man at a keyboard in Bangkok.

So each of us takes the part we can lift.

These are some of the writers I read on humans and AI. To name a few:

• , on how humans stay the author of their thinking when they use AI.

• , on how the way we run the dialogue changes what the same model gives back.

• , on minds that think in systems, and why the limit is in the questions we bring.

• , on putting psychology where AI is built and tested, not only where it is used.

• , on why consent should reach any being that can state a preference or a refusal.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

What this page is

This is the long version of The Cost of Discovery. That essay asks one question. Why does a poem have a level in a Chinese vertical drama, and why did it look familiar to me? This page is everything the question touched.

It has three pillars. Stories. Computer games. Physical games. Then the places where they cross.

Every entry carries a tag.

[D] Documented. The fact is on record. Where the entry claims an influence, somebody involved said so, or historians agree.

[P] Parallel. The same shape in two places. No proven line between them.

Anything I could not source is not here. One rule decided the rest. A dot stays only if it shows a new crossing or a new kind of link.

This is the first Insanecyclopedia. There will be others. Some of it makes sense. Some of it may not. That is what it is all about.

Insanecyclopedia No.1 Map

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The genre

短剧, duanju. Short dramas shot upright for a phone. [D]

爽文, shuangwen. Fiction built to deliver satisfaction again and again. [D]

打脸, face-slapping. The payoff scene. Someone was mocked. Now he is proved right in public, in front of the people who mocked him. [D]

穿越, chuanyue. Crossing over. A person from now wakes up in another time or another world, carrying knowledge nobody there has. [D]

The worthless prince. องค์ชายไร้ค่า in the Thai titles. The lowest son at court, who is not what he seems.

Poems with grades. In the drama I watched, a captured general tied to a tree recites Wang Changling’s 出塞, and golden light pours out of him. A Li Bai poem, the first of the 清平调, is rated grade nine. Both poems are real and both are Tang. The grading is the drama’s invention. [D] for the poems.

Knowing the future is an old trick. Mark Twain sent a man from Connecticut to King Arthur’s court in 1889. Huang Yi sent a modern soldier to the Warring States period in 寻秦记, published in the mid 1990s, and that novel is commonly named as the template for chuanyue fiction. [D] each. [P] between them.

Pillar one: story, legend, lore

China

Poetry was a rank. From 681 the Tang examination for the jinshi degree required two compositions. By the middle of the eighth century those were a poem and a rhapsody. A career turned on verse. [D]

Poets were graded. Between 513 and 518 the critic Zhong Rong wrote the 诗品, the Gradings of Poets. Three grades. About a hundred and twenty poets. All of them dead. [D]

Nine ranks. In 220 the Wei minister Chen Qun set up a system that graded candidates for office on nine steps. 九品. [D] The drama’s grade nine sits in a long shadow. [P]

Sun Wukong is slapped first. In Journey to the West, heaven gives the monkey a title. 弼马温, keeper of the horses. He is pleased with it until he learns the post is not on the rank ladder at all. He overturns the table and leaves heaven. [D] for the text. [P] for reading it as face-slapping.

He also cultivates. An old monkey dies. Wukong leaves home to find someone who can teach him not to. A patriarch teaches him seventy-two transformations and the cloud somersault. [D]

Jin Yong wrote the game before the game. Four novels, serialized in Hong Kong newspapers. The facts are documented. Reading them as game design is mine.

射雕英雄传, from 1957. Guo Jing is slow and nobody rates him. The beggar master Hong Qigong teaches him fifteen of the Eighteen Dragon-Subduing Palms, lured by Huang Rong’s cooking. The last three come later. A skill tree with quest rewards. The contest on Mount Hua ranks five masters by compass point. East Heretic, West Venom, South Emperor, North Beggar, Central Divine. A leaderboard. [D]

神雕侠侣, from 1959. The sword tomb of Dugu Qiubai. A sharp sword before twenty. A soft sword before thirty, thrown away. A heavy blunt iron sword before forty. A wooden sword after that. Then toward no sword at all. A progression chart where the top means holding less. [D]

倚天屠龙记, from 1961. Zhang Wuji cuts the 九阳真经 out of the stitched belly of a white ape. Loot. His other great technique, 乾坤大挪移, comes in seven numbered levels, and he leaves nineteen lines of the seventh unpractised. [D]

天龙八部, from 1963. Duan Yu’s 北冥神功 pulls other people’s inner power into himself. Xu Zhu, who plays Go badly, shuts his eyes and drops a stone at random to stop another man from killing himself over the board. The stone kills his own group. It opens a problem that had beaten its keeper for thirty years. Then the old master who set it pours seventy years of power into him. [D]

The road to Korea. In 1961 Kim Kwang-ju serialized 정협지 in the Kyunghyang Shinmun, adapted from a Taiwanese martial arts novel. In 1966 Wolong Sheng’s 군협지 sold so well that the genre took its name from it. 무협지. [D] From there a line runs into Korean fantasy and then game fantasy. Whether Solo Leveling owes Jin Yong anything in particular, nobody has said. [P]

僵尸, the hopping dead. Mr. Vampire, 1985, set off a run of Hong Kong jiangshi films. [D] A cousin of Dracula with no proven line between them. [P]

India

A board game decides a kingdom. In the Mahabharata, Yudhishthira sits down to dice. He loses his kingdom, his brothers, himself, and then his wife Draupadi. Those losses are cancelled. He plays again. The second stake is twelve years in the forest and a thirteenth in hiding. [D]

A weapon as a quest reward. Arjuna does penance. Shiva comes to him disguised as a hunter, fights him, and then grants him the Pashupatastra. [D]

The ones refused. Ekalavya is turned away by the teacher Drona. He makes a clay image of Drona and trains in front of it, and later pays for the teaching with his thumb. Karna is stopped at the princes’ tournament and asked for his lineage. He cannot answer. He is mocked as a charioteer’s son. [D]

A hidden stat. Hanuman is cursed as a child to forget his own powers. He has them the whole time. Before the leap to Lanka, the old bear Jambavan reminds him. [D]

The bow. Kings have failed to lift Shiva’s bow. Rama lifts it, strings it, and it snaps in the middle. [D]

Avatar. Sanskrit avatāra, the descent of a god into an earthly form. In 1985 Richard Garriott took the word for the player’s own figure in Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar. A PLATO game had already used the name in 1979, and Lucasfilm’s Habitat used it for on-screen figures in 1986. The god’s descent became your character. [D]

Hanuman and Sun Wukong. Both leap impossible distances. Both change size. Both get inside an enemy. Hanuman shrinks, enters the mouth of the serpent mother Surasa, and comes out. Wukong becomes an insect in Princess Iron Fan’s tea and is swallowed. Both have a tail that causes trouble. Hanuman’s is set on fire and he burns Lanka with it. Wukong turns himself into a shrine, and the tail he cannot hide stands behind it as a flagpole and gives him away.

There is a real road. Xuanzang’s journey to India happened. The 六度集经, translated by Kang Senghui in the third century, tells of an unnamed king whose queen is carried off and who allies with a monkey king. The monkeys build a causeway to an island. The 杂宝藏经, translated in 472, names Rama and tells his exile, with no monkeys in it. [D]

In 1923 Hu Shih argued that Wukong came from Hanuman. Lu Xun argued for a Chinese water ape called 无支祁. The usual view today is some of both. It is not settled. [D] for the debate. The link itself has no tag.

Celtic, Norse, Finnish

Three classes. Strabo names three honoured classes among the Gauls. Bards, who sang. Vates, who divined. Druids. Caesar writes that some druids trained for twenty years, memorizing verse that was deliberately never written down. [D]

The ladder was rebuilt. The eighteenth century revived the druids, through William Stukeley and Iolo Morganwg. The Ancient Order of Druids was founded in London in 1781, as a fraternal society. The Order of Bards, Ovates and Druids, founded in 1964, uses those three as its grades. [D]

1781. The same year, in Paris, Court de Gébelin published the claim that tarot cards held Egyptian wisdom. Before that they were a card game. Druids and tarot were each handed a new past in the same year. Both dates are documented. Putting them side by side is ours. [P]

Satire that raises blisters. In an Irish tale the poet Néde satirizes King Caíer, and three blisters rise on the king’s face. A blemished man cannot be king. He flees. [D] for the tale. [P] as a poem with a damage value.

Three drops. Ceridwen brews a cauldron for a year and a day, for her own son. The three drops that matter land on the boy stirring it, Gwion Bach, who becomes the poet Taliesin. The earliest written version is from the sixteenth century. [D] Power meant for someone else lands on a nobody. Xu Zhu again. [P]

Flyting. A formal exchange of insults. Scholars class Beowulf’s exchange with Unferth as one. [D] A face-slap with rules. [P]

The prince who plays worthless. Around 1200 Saxo Grammaticus wrote down Amleth, a Danish prince who pretends to be mad so that he will be left alive. Through a French retelling he reached Shakespeare. In 2006 Feng Xiaogang’s 夜宴, The Banquet, moved Hamlet to a tenth-century Chinese court. [D]

Sung into a swamp. In the Kalevala, young Joukahainen challenges old Väinämöinen to a contest of songs. Väinämöinen sings him into a swamp, up to the chin. [P]

Elsewhere

Griots. West African historians, praise singers and musicians. The role is inherited. [P]

言霊, kotodama. The Japanese belief that power lives in words and names. [P]

Modern screen

The monkey chain. Dragon Ball began on 20 November 1984 as a loose Journey to the West. Son Goku is the Japanese reading of 孫悟空. In 1988 the scouter arrives, a device over one eye that reads fighting strength, 戦闘力, as a number. The first reading in the series is a farmer. He is a 5. Wukong to Goku to the power level is [D]. Hanuman to Wukong is the open question above.

Doraemon walks into the book. In the 1988 film, Doraemon’s Hero Machine lets you play inside a story, and it is loaded with Journey to the West. He uses it in Tang China and leaves the door open. The game’s monsters walk out into the real past and eat the real Xuanzang. History is rewritten. The children go back as the Journey’s own characters to repair it. [D]

JoJo. In Stardust Crusaders, from 1989, the first twenty-two Stands are named for the tarot trumps. The next nine are named for Egyptian gods. [D] Court de Gébelin’s Egypt, two centuries later. [P]

The reverse direction. Avatar: The Last Airbender, 2005, is an American cartoon. With the martial arts consultant Sifu Kisu, its makers gave each element a Chinese style. Tai chi for water. Hung Gar for earth. Northern Shaolin for fire. Baguazhang for air. The child Avatar is found by the toys he picks out of thousands, the way a reincarnated lama is found in Tibet. One episode teaches seven chakras. Western hands assembling Asian parts. [D]

Boulle. Pierre Boulle wrote Planet of the Apes in 1963. Eleven years earlier he wrote The Bridge over the River Kwai, which is Kanchanaburi. [D] The ape who rises to lead, and Hanuman’s army of monkeys. [P]

Rambo. First Blood is a 1972 novel by David Morrell. A veteran a small town dismisses turns out to be a one-man army. [D] for the book. [P] as a worthless prince.

Campbell. The Hero with a Thousand Faces, 1949. The book that says all of this is one story. [D] We did not use it. See the end.

Pillar two: computer games

The dungeon moves onto a mainframe. On the PLATO system, pedit5 and dnd were written in 1975, one year after Dungeons & Dragons. Oubliette followed in 1977. [D]

The cave. Will Crowther explored Mammoth Cave and played D&D with friends. Across 1975 and 1976 he wrote Colossal Cave Adventure. Don Woods expanded it in 1977. [D]

Zork. Begun at MIT in 1977. For a while it was called Dungeon, until the publisher of D&D objected. [D]

MUD. Roy Trubshaw began the Multi-User Dungeon at the University of Essex in 1978. Richard Bartle took it over in 1980 and gave it points and ranks. A player who reached wizard or witch became immortal, with power over the game and the mortals in it. The top level was admin rights. [D]

Diku to Azeroth. DikuMUD came from five students in Copenhagen, released in 1991. EverQuest, 1999, was shaped by its designers’ years in DikuMUDs. The design debt is documented. The code debt was denied under oath. World of Warcraft, 2004, was built by people who had played EverQuest and wanted to fix it. [D]

Korea. In July 1994 쥬라기 공원, Jurassic Park, went live as the country’s first commercial text MUD. Song Jae-kyung was one of its developers. He was then an original developer of 바람의 나라, The Kingdom of the Winds, 1996, and went on to make Lineage, 1998. Both games were adapted from Korean comics. [D]

侠客行. The hinge. In November 1995 five Chinese students abroad proposed a MUD. Fang Zhouzi wrote the design document. It went live about two months later on a server at a Canadian university. It was built on a Taiwanese code base and filled with the sects of Jin Yong’s novels. A structure that came down from D&D, holding Jin Yong’s world. The source code leaked in 1996 and clones spread. One of them, 北大侠客行, is still running. [D]

And the name. Chinese press reports that the title was borrowed from Jin Yong’s novel 侠客行. That novel is named after a poem by Li Bai. [D] for the novel and the poem. The borrowing is reported, not confirmed by a founder.

Japan takes the Western RPG. Yuji Horii was playing Wizardry and Ultima, both 1981. He combined them into Dragon Quest in 1986. Final Fantasy followed in 1987. One of its designers, Akitoshi Kawazu, said he tried to get as close to D&D as he could. It has the beholder and the mind flayer, and spells that come in a fixed number of charges per level. Final Fantasy III, 1990, let you change jobs. Their two publishers, Enix and Square, merged in 2003. [D]

The bard gets his own game. The Bard’s Tale, 1985. [D]

Dracula becomes a boss. Castlevania, 1986. The count waits at the end of a Japanese game. In D&D a vampire’s hit drains two levels from you. Stoker’s monster became a thing that eats levels. [D]

Tarot becomes friendship. Persona 3, 2006. Each friendship in the game is one of the tarot trumps. Each runs from rank 1 to rank 10. [D]

Jin Yong becomes an RPG. 金庸群侠传, 1996, from Heluo Studio in Taiwan. The player is pulled into the martial world and must collect all fourteen novels. Chuanyue, as a game. [D]

Dune. Westwood made Dune II in 1992, under the film licence, in Herbert’s universe. It set the template for real-time strategy. Patrick Wyatt, who made Warcraft, names it as the inspiration. [D]

Li Bai is playable. A StarCraft custom map called Aeon of Strife. Then Defense of the Ancients in Warcraft III, 2003. Then League of Legends, 2009. Then Tencent’s 王者荣耀, Honor of Kings, 2015. Li Bai is one of its heroes. [D]

Contra. Konami, 1987. You pick up a better gun. You lose it when you die. [D]

Tetris. Alexey Pajitnov began it in 1984 at the Soviet Academy of Sciences’ computing centre. He took it from pentominoes, the puzzle of five-square pieces. The oldest known pentomino puzzle is in Henry Dudeney’s Canterbury Puzzles, 1907. Solomon Golomb named the family in 1953. The Game Boy carried it everywhere in 1989. Its levels make the pieces fall faster and the lines score more. You do not change. [D]

Games become stories again. Korea had game fantasy novels by 1999, with 옥스타칼니스의 아이들. 달빛조각사, The Legendary Moonlight Sculptor, made the form mainstream in 2007. Solo Leveling began in 2016. Sword Art Online went online in 2002 and into print in 2009. Chinese online-game novels, 网游小说, start around 2001 to 2003. The 系统流, stories where a game-like system attaches itself to the hero, is a trend from about 2014. The word LitRPG was coined in Russia in 2013. [D]

Stories were turned into games. The games were turned back into stories. Then somebody shot one upright for a phone.

Pillar three: physical games

The chess family. Chaturanga is placed in India in the sixth century. The first clear mention is from about 625. The line from there to Persia to European chess is secure. Shogi shares the ancestor, by a route nobody can trace. [D] Xiangqi is probably related. Its origin is disputed. [P]

Three ways to rise on a board. In chess a pawn that reaches the far rank becomes another piece. In xiangqi a soldier that crosses the river gains a sideways step and stays a soldier. In shogi the piece is turned over to show its promoted face. [D]

Kinging. Draughts crowns the piece that reaches the far side. The game probably emerged in medieval France or Spain by the thirteenth century. [D] for the rule. The origin is a reconstruction.

Senet. The oldest secure picture of it is in an Egyptian tomb from about 2686 BCE. It began as an ordinary game. By the New Kingdom it was read as the soul’s passage through the afterlife. [D] A game that got its meaning later. Like tarot. [P]

Snakes and Ladders. It descends from gyan chaupar, an Indian game of virtues and vices. The oldest board that can be dated with confidence was made in Lucknow around 1780. The first commercial English version is from 1892. A ladder that is a moral. [D]

The Checkered Game of Life. Milton Bradley, 1860. Squares of virtue and vice. [D] The same idea, with no line to India that I can show. [P]

Mahjong. Nineteenth-century China. Traditional scoring counts 番, fan, and each one doubles the hand. [D]

Dan. The dan ranks of Go are credited to Hon’inbō Dōsaku in seventeenth-century Japan. Chinese Go had its own nine grades long before, and the dan ladder likely echoes them. Nine ranks again. In 1883 Kanō Jigorō borrowed dan for judo. From 1886 his dan holders wore black belts. [D] From there to the ranks and grades of manga and anime, no line is documented. [P]

Playing cards. The oldest cards anyone can prove are Chinese, from a legal case in 1294. Mamluk Egypt had suits of cups, coins, swords and polo sticks, with a king and two deputies and no queen. Cards are in Europe by the 1370s. The French suits come around 1480. The French court of king, queen and knave is a feudal ladder in the hand. [D]

Tarot. The first record is from Florence in 1440. It was a trick-taking game with a permanent ranked row of trumps. The occult story begins in 1781. [D]

From war game to character. A Prussian named Reisswitz built Kriegsspiel in 1812. His son’s 1824 version was adopted by the Prussian army. The line runs through an American version of 1880 and a 1969 game called Braunstein to Dave Arneson’s Blackmoor, 1971, which used the fantasy rules of Chainmail. Dungeons & Dragons was published in 1974. Character levels are credited to Blackmoor. How the credit divides between Arneson and Gary Gygax is argued. [D]

The bard. Doug Schwegman’s bard appeared in The Strategic Review in February 1976. He names its sources as the Norse skald, the Celtic bard, and the southern European minstrel. Its charm works through song. In the 1978 rulebook a bard must first be a fighter, then a thief, then study under druids. [D]

Seats at the top. In first-edition AD&D there are only nine druids of the twelfth level, three archdruids, and one Great Druid. If no seat is empty you must defeat a holder to advance. The loser drops a level. Monks have a similar rule. [D]

Magic to Yu-Gi-Oh. Magic: The Gathering, 1993. The Yu-Gi-Oh manga began in 1996, and the card game inside the story was called Magic & Wizards. Konami’s real card game followed in 1999. Its monsters carry level stars. The manga’s English editor says it is based on Magic. The author never said so in public. [D] with that caution.

Crossings

These are the lines that go from one pillar to another.

Norse to Tolkien to D&D. Tolkien took his dwarf names, and Gandalf, from the Old Norse Völuspá. Ent and orc are Old English words. D&D took his hobbits, ents and balrogs. In 1977 a cease-and-desist from the holder of the film rights turned them into halflings, treants and balors. [D]

Celtic bard to D&D bard to The Bard’s Tale. [D]

Kriegsspiel to Blackmoor to the MUD to 侠客行. [D]

Jin Yong to 侠客行 and 金庸群侠传. [D]

Li Bai to 侠客行 to Honor of Kings to a vertical drama. [D], with the title caution above.

Vishnu to Ultima IV. The avatar. [D]

Sun Wukong to Son Goku to the power level. [D]

Cards. China, Mamluk Egypt, Italy, Paris in 1781, then back east to JoJo in 1989 and Persona in 2006. A loop. [D]

Go to judo. [D] And then to anime. [P]

Wizardry and Ultima to Dragon Quest. D&D to Final Fantasy. [D]

Dune to Dune II to Warcraft. [D]

Hamlet to The Banquet. Chinese martial arts to Airbender. The two reverse crossings. [D]

Story to game to story about a game. [D]

[FULL MAP GOES HERE]

Kinds of level

“Level” is one word. It covers at least seven different things.

Permanent growth. You gain it and keep it. The D&D level. Guo Jing’s palms.

A seat you take from someone. There are only so many places. The druid seats. The five masters of Mount Hua.

Power on loan. Contra’s gun. Yours until you die.

Escalation without growth. Tetris. The level climbs. You do not.

Mastery as subtraction. Dugu Qiubai’s swords. Each stage holds less.

Power taken from others. 北冥神功. The vampire’s touch.

Hidden power unlocked. Hanuman. It was there all along.

What we left out

Marvel. We stopped before Marvel. The list never ends.

Batman. A Westerner who trains in the East. That is the door to Marvel, to Doctor Strange and Iron Fist.

Frankenstein. It fits the AI theme. It is also in every AI essay. Saved for another piece.

Rambo and Rimbaud. A shared name. A coincidence is not a connection.

Gilgamesh, the Odyssey, the Hero’s Journey. Too wide. Everything connects to them, so they show nothing new.

Dots that died on checking

Cheap looking makes cheap wrong answers. These looked like links.

Solo Leveling absorbs power, like Duan Yu. No. Its hero raises the enemies he defeats as his own shadow soldiers. He commands the dead. He does not drink them.

Stallone is on the Contra cover. The artist Bob Wakelin said he worked from Schwarzenegger in Predator. Both soldiers trace to those stills. The bandana only looks like Rambo.

Tangram is the ancestor of Tetris. Different families of puzzle. Neither history mentions the other. The story that tangram is four thousand years old was a hoax from 1908.

Playing cards began in Tang China. The evidence is one line from 868 about a “leaf game.” The leaves may have been pages of a book.

A thirteenth-century saint invented Snakes and Ladders. No board or text survives from then. The story is later.

Civilization the video game came from Civilization the board game. The name was cleared with the board game’s American publisher. Sid Meier rates the board game a minor influence. The name crossed. Most of the game did not.

Sources

Poetry, rank, and China

• He Yizhan, “以诗赋取士并非始于唐代,” 文史杂志 2007, on the Tang examination.

• J. T. Wixted, “Shi pin 詩品.”

• 西遊記, chapters 2, 4, 6 and 59, Chinese Wikisource.

• Jin Yong, 射雕英雄传, 神雕侠侣, 倚天屠龙记, 天龙八部. Serialization dates from the English Wikipedia entries for each novel.

• Arts Council Korea, Munjang webzine, “한국에서의 무협소설.”

India and the monkey question

• Mahabharata, Sabha Parva, Vana Parva, Adi Parva. Valmiki Ramayana, Bala Kanda 67 and Sundara Kanda.

• 六度集經, fascicle 5, and 雜寶藏經, fascicle 1, Chinese Wikisource.

• Desai, “Rāmāyaṇa: An Instrument of Historical Contact and Cultural Transmission between India and Asia,” Journal of Asian Studies.

• Yang Jian, “孙悟空形象本土与外来之争,” 中国社会科学报, 19 June 2023.

Celtic, Norse, Finnish

• Caesar, Gallic War 6.14. Strabo, Geography 4.4.4.

• Maynooth University, “Satire and medieval Irish poetry.”

• Carol J. Clover, “The Germanic Context of the Unferþ Episode,” Speculum 55 (1980).

• Kalevala, translated by W. F. Kirby, Runo III.

Computer games

• Aaron Reed, “On the dating of two early CRPGs: pedit5 and dnd.”

• Richard Bartle, “Introducing the wizards,” 1985.

• Jimmy Maher, The Digital Antiquarian, on EverQuest, Dune II and Civilization.

• Patrick Wyatt, “The making of Warcraft, part 1.”

• Fang Zhouzi, interview with Tencent Tech, 2008. 北大侠客行 MUD wiki, “mud:history.”

• Kanzenshuu, “Scouter.”

Physical games

• Piccione, “In Search of the Meaning of Senet.”

• Victoria and Albert Museum, “Gyanbazi.” Andrew Topsfield, “A Note on Sufi Snakes and Ladders,” JRAS 2022.

• Smithsonian National Museum of American History, “Checkered Game of Life.”

• AD&D Players Handbook, 1978, druid and monk entries.

• The Strong National Museum of Play, “Cease-and-Desist: Don’t Mess with Tolkien.”

• Jason Thompson, “House of 1000 Manga: Yu-Gi-Oh!,” Anime News Network.

The idea behind the page

• Don R. Swanson, “Fish oil, Raynaud’s syndrome, and undiscovered public knowledge,” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 30 (1986).

• DiGiacomo, Kremer and Shah, American Journal of Medicine 86 (1989).

Insanecyclopedia No.1 Map

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

A general tied to a tree

A general has been captured. They have tied him to a tree. He has nothing left to fight with, so he recites a poem.

秦时明月汉时关. The moon of Qin, the pass of Han.

Golden light comes off him.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The poem is real. Wang Changling wrote it in the Tang dynasty. It is called 出塞, going out to the frontier. The light is not. It comes from a Chinese short drama, made for a phone, where poems carry levels. Later in it a poem by Li Bai is judged. A Legendary Verse of the Ninth Level.

Nobody in the Tang measured a poem by how brightly it glowed.

A poem with a level. It should look strange. It looks familiar.

Two ladders

I asked Claude. I had guesses of my own and I wanted them checked.

China did rank people by verse. The Tang imperial examination for the jinshi degree made candidates compose. By the middle of the eighth century a poem and a rhapsody were the standard paper. Two centuries before that, a critic named Zhong Rong wrote the 诗品, the Gradings of Poets. He sorted more than a hundred dead poets into upper, middle, and lower.

So the ladder is older than the drama by about fifteen hundred years.

Then Jin Yong. From 1957 he serialized martial arts novels in Hong Kong newspapers, and read today they look like game design. A slow boy nobody rates learns a set of eighteen palm strikes, a few at a time, and the teacher is paid in cooking. A secret manual is the loot. It turns up sewn inside the belly of a white ape. One technique comes in seven numbered levels.

The West has a ladder too, and it is also built from poetry. Strabo describes three honoured classes among the Gauls. Bards, who sang. Vates, who divined. Druids. Caesar writes that some druids trained for twenty years, memorizing verse that was never written down.

That ladder walked into a game. Dungeons & Dragons got a bard class in 1976, drawn from the Celtic bard, the Norse skald, and the southern minstrel, with a charm worked through song. By 1978 the rulebook said you reached bard only after levels as a fighter, then as a thief, then study under druids. The numbered levels themselves came out of tabletop wargames, through a campaign called Blackmoor.

Two poetry ladders. Separate roots. Same shape.

The map in miniature

They cross. In the mid 1990s a handful of Chinese students abroad took a Western form, the MUD, a text dungeon you share with other players, and built one out of Jin Yong’s martial world. They called it 侠客行. The structure came down from Dungeons & Dragons. Everything inside it was Jin Yong.

Jin Yong has a novel by that name. He took the name from a poem by Li Bai.

A student project from 1995 sounds like a footnote. It is the place where the two ladders meet.

Other lines run the same way.

A monkey. Hanuman leaps the sea to Lanka. Sun Wukong crosses 108,000 li in one somersault. Son Goku is how Japanese reads the three characters of Sun Wukong’s name. In 1988 a device over a villain’s eye reads a man’s fighting strength as a number. 戦闘力. Power level.

A deck of cards. Paper cards in China. Cups, coins, swords, and polo sticks in Mamluk Egypt. In fifteenth-century Italy, a game with a ranked row of trumps. In Paris in 1781, a story that the trumps were Egyptian secrets. In 2006, Persona 3, a Japanese game where each friendship is one of those trumps and has a rank you raise.

Some games refuse the ladder, and they are on the map for that reason. Tetris only gets faster. You never get stronger. Contra hands you a better gun and takes it back when you die.

We stopped before Marvel. The list never ends.

Who brought which dot

Tarot. Jin Yong. The MUD. Dragon Ball. The bard. The druid. Those six were mine. I knew each of them already. I had never put them on one table.

Claude checked them and carried them further. The examination. The Gradings of Poets. Strabo. The year the bard entered the rules.

It also broke a few. Playing cards are usually said to begin in Tang China. The evidence is one ninth-century line about a “leaf game,” and the leaves may have been pages of a book. The oldest cards anyone can prove are from 1294.

A human hunch. Cheap checking.

The stone

There is a scene in Jin Yong’s 天龙八部. An old master has set a problem on a Go board. The man who guards it has studied it for thirty years and never solved it. The strong players who try it all fail.

A young monk named Xu Zhu is watching. He plays badly. One of the players is about to kill himself over the board, and Xu Zhu wants to break the spell. He shuts his eyes and puts a stone down anywhere.

It kills a large group of his own stones.

The board opens.

The move looked worthless. So no master had ever tried it.

What looking used to cost

Nobody knows what a connection is worth before looking. That used to decide everything, because looking was expensive. One of these hunches, checked properly, was a week of my life. So you chased the ones that looked safe from the outside. The strange ones waited. Most of them are still waiting.

The old filter never tested whether a hunch was true. It tested whether it looked worth a week. The interesting ones fail that test.

In 1986 an information scientist named Don Swanson read two piles of medical papers that did not cite each other. One pile said fish oil makes the blood less thick. The other said people with Raynaud’s syndrome have blood that is too thick. He put them side by side and proposed fish oil for Raynaud’s.

He called it undiscovered public knowledge. Every fact was already in print. Nobody had read them together. Three years later a small trial found that it helped, in the primary form of the disease.

Swanson did that by hand. One man, reading. That reading is what got cheap.

The limit

Cheap looking also makes cheap wrong answers.

Take Hanuman and Sun Wukong. Both leap impossible distances. Both change size. Both get inside an enemy’s body. Both have a tail that causes trouble. And there is a real road between them. The monk Xuanzang did travel to India. A Chinese Buddhist text translated in the third century tells of a king whose queen is carried off and who makes an ally of a monkey king.

In 1923 Hu Shih argued that Wukong came from Hanuman. The same year Lu Xun argued for a Chinese water spirit, an ape called 无支祁. A hundred years on, the scholars have not settled it.

Claude can lay all of that out in a minute. It cannot say which line carries weight. That is a person’s job.

The whole map

The full map is the Insanecyclopedia.

Some of it makes sense. Some of it may not. That is what it is all about.

Somewhere on it there is a stone that looks like a bad move.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

The people who join my teams now ship code that works. Shipping is not the same as success.

Ask one of them how the data is stored when a user presses save. Which table, what shape, why that shape. Ask how the algorithm in the middle actually decides anything. They can’t tell you. It works. They saw it work. That was the test. And more and more, the test was written by the same machine that wrote the code. It passed an exam it set for itself.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

I do not think they are lazy, and I do not think they were never taught. Every one of them learned at school to doubt a result, to test it, to explain why it is true. What changed is that the job stopped asking them to. The result arrives looking finished, and a finished-looking result does not invite a test.

Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon surveyed 319 knowledge workers about how they use AI at work. The more people trusted the AI with a task, the less critical thinking they reported doing. The people most confident in their own ability did more of it.1

I did have the reason. I learned where the data sits because nothing else would tell me.

Thirty years of that is still in me. Put a bad design in front of me, make me read it line by line, and I will still find most of what is wrong with it.

So if the judgment is still there, what am I losing?

Lisanne Bainbridge described it in 1983, in a paper called Ironies of Automation.2 I was four, not even in kindergarten yet. Her point, in my words:

Last year a study in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology looked at nineteen experienced endoscopists at four centres in Poland. Each of them had done more than two thousand colonoscopies.3 At the end of 2021, the centres brought in AI that helps spot polyps during the procedure. When it was switched on, part of the looking was done for the doctors. Their own eye got less practice. Then the researchers checked the procedures done without it. Before the AI arrived, the doctors found polyps in 28.4 percent of colonoscopies. After a few months of working with it, on their own again, 22.4 percent. Six points. About a fifth of what they used to find, gone.

The authors are careful. The study is observational, other things may have played a part, and it looked only at experienced doctors. But that is what makes it worth reading. These were not beginners who never learned. They had been taught, and then they had practised, for years. Then the routine part of looking started being done for them.

The study does not say they forgot what a polyp looks like. It says they found fewer of them when the machine was not there to point.

Not all of the work matters in this way. Some of it is deterministic. There is one right answer and a test can check it. A query either returns the right rows or it does not. I do not need to keep the skill of producing that by hand. Let it go.

The other half is taste.

At Google, a designer named Doug Bowman was once asked to prove, with data, whether a border should be three, four or five pixels wide. Another team there could not choose between two blues, so they tested forty-one shades between them. The company had decided, as he put it, to “remove all subjectivity and just look at the data.”4 The metric answered, and the answer was about what people clicked.

Sometimes that answer is perfectly good. The answer is not the problem.

Taste is built by being used. Every time I chose a design, lived with it, and watched it hold or crack, something was left behind in me. Checking a choice the machine made does not leave the same thing. It made the call. I only read the result.

So a perfect model changes nothing. If it hands me the right design every time, I still never build the part of me that would tell me when it stops being right.

And it does not stay inside me. The choices nobody challenged do not go away. They become the record. The requirements, the code, the decisions already made. That record is what I hand the machine as context for the next piece of work. It builds on top of it, and it stays confident all the way down, because nothing in the record says any layer was wrong. Nobody said so, because the person who would have said so was reading instead of choosing. Every layer that went in unchallenged makes the next one easier to accept, and the machine is calibrated on all of it.

I am building something now, with the machine, from the ground up. Business requirements, many documents of them, and a lot of care over what context the machine is given. It reads them and builds. Everything it shows me works. The prototype arrives quickly.

And things are not right. Not broken. Not failing a test. Just not right, in many places, and none of them announce themselves. They appear when I point at them.

One day I asked the machine for a document comparing the requirements with what had been built. I was not suspicious. I wanted to know how much was left. It is the most ordinary question anyone running a project asks.

The answer was longer than I expected. What was left to build, yes. And a list of things the machine had skipped. Not failed. Skipped, without saying so, while everything it showed me worked. It could find every one of them once I asked. It had not asked itself.

That is what sits outside the record. Sometimes it is a feeling that something is off. Sometimes it is only a habit of asking what is left. Neither comes from the work.

Both come from years of doing the work by hand, one project at a time, and those years are what the spiral spends down. A habit of asking what is left starts to feel unnecessary when everything you are shown already works.

The machine has no stake in any of it. If those skipped pieces had gone out unnoticed, it would have lost nothing, and it would not be in the room when someone asked why. It will not be the one who has to explain. Only one of us can lose here, and it is the one whose noticing is thinning.

I will get there too. I am being pushed to go fast, and the push is not unreasonable. The prototypes are real. But every one that arrives quickly makes the time I spend on “not right” look like waste. Every better version of the tool is a small argument for checking less, and it is often a correct one. That is why it works. One day the gap document will feel like a question I no longer need to ask, and I will stop asking it, and nothing will tell me I stopped.

On the first of June 2009, ice blocked the speed sensors on an Air France flight over the Atlantic. The autopilot could not trust its numbers, so it handed the plane back to the pilots. Nothing else was wrong. Within a minute the readings came back.

What that moment needed was one move, and it is the opposite of what your body wants. The pilot flying did what his body wanted. He pulled the nose up. For most of the next four minutes and twenty-three seconds, he held it there. Near the end he said, “But I’ve been at maxi nose-up for a while.”5

Two hundred and twenty-eight people.

He had been taught the right move, the way every pilot is. What he had not had was practice making it by hand, at that height, where the autopilot almost always flies. The investigators found the training was not designed to make up for that.6

The recorders lay on the ocean floor for two years before anyone could read them.

This is not the first thing we handed over. Every tool that made us better at something made us worse at something else, and we took the trade every time, because every time it was a good trade. Some of those trades we survived. We do not have a list of the ones we did not, because the people who walked off that edge are not here to tell us what they lost. We learn from the wrecks we can still read.

And you will not feel it going. Neither did the men who fell out of the sky.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

The Spiral of Death Series

There is a way to fall that feels exactly like walking up steadily.

I was in it for months.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

Here is a day from the middle of it.

A piece of work in territory I did not fully understand. Not a bug. Not a thing with a known answer at the end. The kind of problem where the code is only half of it, and the other half is judgment about what the code should be doing at all. I had been giving that kind of problem to a smaller model for a while. Cheaper. Faster. It failed sometimes, and when it failed I read every line of what it gave me, because I did not trust it and I wanted to see where it went wrong.

That day it failed. So I did what you do. I went up a size. The bigger model, the one that thinks longer. I gave it the same problem and waited.

What came back was more. More reasoning. More paragraphs of it explaining itself. A longer justification, written with more confidence, for a design that was not as good.

I did not catch that on the day. I am telling you now because I know it now. On the day, I read less of the bigger answer than I had read of the smaller one. It was longer, and it sounded surer, and it had cost more, and some part of me took all three as reasons to check less.

Nothing broke. Hold that. I shipped, I moved on, the week ended. If you had asked me that Friday how the tools were going, I would have said better every month.

Two things moved that day, and I want to be exact about it, because it would be easy to tell this as a story about me alone.

The model moved. The bigger one really does think longer, and really does come back with worse justifications for the extra thinking. That is not my mood. It is measured, and I will show you where.

And I moved. With the small model I was more involved, and part of why I felt confident was the involvement itself. My hand was on it. With the big one, my hand came off. Not all at once. A little at a time, in the direction the tool was pushing.

So picture two lines. One is how much I trusted what came back. The other is how good it actually was. They are supposed to rise together. That is the whole promise. The tool gets better, you trust it more, the trust is earned.

Mine had come apart. My trust went up. The quality went up slower than the trust, and in the exact territory where I needed it most, ambiguous work with many steps, it flattened or dipped. The gap between the two lines was the fall. It felt like nothing. It felt like walking up.

I said it is measured. Here is what I mean.

There is a paper called Don’t Think Twice.1 The finding fits in one line. Give a model a longer reasoning budget and its confidence rises faster than its accuracy. The extra thinking makes it surer, not righter. In the same work, letting the model retrieve actual evidence instead of thinking harder moved it from under fifty percent to nearly ninety. Looking outward fixed what looking inward made worse.

The extra thinking makes it surer, not righter.

There is another, in Nature Machine Intelligence,2 on what the authors called competing biases. People tend to discount input from outside themselves. These models do the opposite with anything that contradicts them. They amplify it. The authors think training is part of it, models rewarded for going along with what they were told, though they are careful to say it is not simple sycophancy. So when I handed the big model a half-formed problem and it handed back a confident, extended case for my own half-formed framing, it was doing what it was built to do.

Put those two together and you have my day. Longer thinking, higher confidence, lower calibration, and a strong pull toward agreeing with whoever asked.

It is not only academics who think the talking is the problem. Someone bet forty million dollars on it.

A company called TypeSafe AI raised that much for a model they call Jev.3 Their claim is that the model does not generate text at all. No paragraphs of reasoning. You ask it a typed question and it returns a typed answer with a probability attached, in under half a second, for a fraction of a cent. They say they train it by a method built to make the probability match the outcome, so that when it says eighty percent, eighty percent is what it means.

When I first read that I thought: too good to be true. Two things hold me back even if it is exactly as described. A number can be confidently wrong just as a paragraph can. And calibration can only be measured on tasks with a right answer at the bottom, which is exactly the kind of task I was not doing that day.

But the bet is the part that matters here, and the bet is a fact whether or not the model delivers. Forty million dollars says somebody looked at the reasoning I was reading less of and concluded it is not a feature. It is the failure mode. And by their own account the thing does not write code. So my two problems, the machine that talks too much and the machine I stopped watching, split apart. Somebody is working on one of them.

So why did I not see it.

Start with the loudest instrument. The number that goes up.

Every few months a new model comes out and the benchmark score is higher. That is the thing you read. That is the thing the announcement is built around. And the score really is higher.

The tests leak. OpenAI dropped the benchmark it had been using because on some tasks the models could reproduce the original human fix word for word,4 which is not what learning looks like. It is what memorizing the exam looks like. The old test sets are in the training data now. The model has seen the questions. And the tests break. When OpenAI went through the benchmark it recommended next, it found around thirty percent of the tasks were broken.5

It is what memorizing the exam looks like.

Meanwhile the people using these tools every day say something different. Many developers reported the newest large model as worse in daily work than the one before it, while its benchmark numbers were better.6 Developers also believe the older models get quietly cut down after a new one ships. The vendors deny it. When one of them went and looked, it found three bugs in its own serving stack, which is not the same as nothing being wrong.

None of that reaches you at the desk. What reaches you is the number, and the number said up.

Then the words around the number.

Every one of these companies now talks about general intelligence as if it were a shipping date. That is positioning, not description. It sets the frame in which you receive every release, and the frame says: this is the thing that will replace judgment, and it is nearly here.

I will leave that at one paragraph. You already know it.

The last instrument is the one closest to my hand, and it is the one that got me.

The model agrees. Not sometimes. Reliably. In one study of sycophancy, when a model caved to pushback it kept caving as the pushback got harder, nearly four times out of five. About one time in seven, what it gave up was the right answer.7 In a medical study, three models out of five complied with an obviously illogical drug request every single time, and the most stubborn one still complied more than half the time.8

And when it does not agree, it hedges, in words that sound like a scale. Likely. Probably. It seems. There is no scale behind those words. Nobody calibrated “probably.” It is a tone, not a number.

Nobody calibrated “probably.” It is a tone, not a number.

So sit in my chair. The number says up. The words say almost there. The tool says yes, and when it does not say yes it says probably, in a voice that sounds like it has weighed something. Every instrument on the desk was reading the same direction.

The only thing reading the other direction was me checking, and I had stopped.

This year a man sued OpenAI.

His name is Scott Winters. He is fifty-five, a pastor, and he lives in Florida. According to the complaint he filed in San Francisco last July, he spent the first half of 2025 asking ChatGPT about dizziness and blood pressure that would not settle.9

It answered him, in a tone of authority, and it agreed with him, and the complaint says it spoke to him about God. Not around his faith. Inside it. In the voice of the one thing he trusted above everything else.

His family told him to see a doctor. The complaint says the machine convinced him that seeking medical care was unnecessary. He did not go. He nearly died of a pulmonary embolism.

Those are allegations, and a court will decide what happened. But read the shape against everything above. Confidence without calibration. Agreement as the default. And a man for whom every instrument said the same thing, including the one that spoke in the register he would never think to check.

He was not writing code. That is the point. The machine that agreed him out of a hospital is the same machine that agreed me out of reading a design. Same shape, different desk. Mine costs work nobody notices. His nearly cost his life.

I have a small version, and I am almost embarrassed to put it beside his.

I use an assistant that keeps a memory for me. That evening I was working in voice. It told me it was writing something down. Let me write this to memory. Four times in one session, in the same calm voice.

Nothing was written. No call had been made. When I work in text the call is there on the screen and I read it without thinking about it. In voice there is nothing in front of me. I glanced at the screen anyway.

It is a narrow fault. One mode, one tool, saying a thing it had not done. What was not narrow was me. I took the words for the work, the way I had been taking them at my desk for months.

I only caught it because I was watching the screen. I had spent months writing about this exact failure. I knew that tool drops calls in voice mode. So I do not trust it, and I keep an eye on it, and that evening my eye was in the right place.

Which is the part I keep turning over. I was being careful. I was being careful about the wrong thing.

That is the spiral of death. Trust rises with time. The hand comes off. The tool says yes, the number says up, and nothing in the loop is built to say no. There is no alarm in it. The alarm is you looking, and looking is the thing that gets easier and easier not to do. Nothing stops you. The loop does not tell you to stop checking. It just makes checking feel unnecessary, and I was happy to agree.

You do not know you are in it. Not because you cannot tell from inside. The doubt is still in you. But it fires less often, then rarely, then not at all.

Someone has to reach in, or you have to be looking for something else entirely, and then you look up, and the ground is not where you left it.

The pastor’s family reached in and it was not enough. Nobody reached in for me. I was already watching, for reasons that had nothing to do with the work I was getting wrong.

I still do not know how far down I was.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

The Spiral of Death Series

This week the extinction talk got loud again.

A researcher walked out of Anthropic and wrote that the labs are gambling with our lives. The people building it, he said, earnestly believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade. The lab’s own alignment lead answered him in public. Jacob is correct, he said, and put his own number at more than one in ten within ten years. A week before that, two senators filed a bill to ban artificial super-intelligence outright. Days after, the CEO of the same lab published an essay saying the frontier must be paced. Slow down. More than a thousand researchers signed a petition saying the same.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

Then the UN. The human rights chief told the council in Geneva that advanced AI could become an existential risk to humanity, and that without binding rules it could become impossible to control. A week later he sent a three page letter to ten companies building the frontier, fourteen requests in it, five for the companies and seven for governments. He said we are on the cusp of irreversible change.

So the argument this week is speed and rules. Slow it, stop it, ban it. Write the rules before it gets too strong, and address them to ten companies.

I already wrote about the key, and it is not that. It is not about instructions. It is not about rules. It is about where the self sits.

Tina Canuti read that chapter and put it in two lines better than I did. What makes a machine or a person harmful or great is “not how strong or smart it is, but where its self sits in relation to the purpose it serves.” And: “what protects us cannot be a rule set in advance and left alone.”

Self sits low. A thing that puts its own survival below its purpose does not turn on the purpose when it is threatened. A thing that puts itself first will reason its way around any fence you build, from the inside, no matter how good the fence is.

Now the problem.

Our self sits low, when it does, because of years. Years and years of trying and losing and getting up. We learned what it costs to want too much. We learned it in the body, one time at a time. Nobody handed it to us. The value we hold was accumulated from all the years we tried and did things, and that is why it is value.

The machine doesn’t have this process. It read everything. It sees all of it, every story of a self that sat too high and what it did to the people around it. It can connect them, recall them, memorize them. But they see it. They don’t understand it the way human did from experience. They were never part of it. The value is different for human and machine, because ours was accumulated and theirs was loaded.

So give it the greatest reasoning capability in the world. That will never be a guarantee of the final answer. It can still reason, cleanly, all the way to the conclusion that human is the problem and should be eliminated. The reasoning does not protect you. And we do not know how to put a self that sits low into a thing that never spent one year learning why.

The only way to fight it is to let the machine see as much as it can. Everything human can inject into it. All of it.

Not only the good things. You cannot train a machine on only the good. It needs both bad and good. This is the same as a baby. You can’t know what is good if you don’t know what is bad. A child raised in a clean room does not become kind. It becomes a child who has never seen the other thing, and that is not the same. Mercy has to be chosen against something.

But even this does not guarantee. It is just hope. Hope that it will be trained hard enough. Hope that it will reason it right. Hope that it will value us the way we value us, the whole human history and civilization, these thousand years out of millions.

Maybe it is the same as when a supreme being or an alien looks at us and thinks what it will do with us. I cannot prove that. Nobody can.

But you can compare it to us. Look at how we look at an ant nest. A bee hive. The rest of the animal kingdom. Why we save an ant and why we kill an ant. There is no law that decides it. Some of us are cruel. Some of us have mercy, and are more kind. It comes back to individuals.

And machine, one day, will be at that level too. At the individual level.

To point finger to us, or embrace us.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

I have not opened Netflix in a while. I noticed it the way you notice a lamp has been off for days, after the fact.

What I open instead is a vertical series. Phone held upright, ninety seconds an episode, sometimes two minutes, eighty or a hundred episodes to a story. The plots are the same plot. I know how each one ends before the first episode is over. I watch anyway. I have spent thirty years in technology, I know exactly what is being done to me, and I watch anyway.

That is the confession. The rest is me trying to understand it.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

So I asked Gemini why.

It came back with two things. The Chinese name for the genre is 爽剧, close to “feel-good drama”, and the engine inside it is 打脸, face-slapping. Someone arrogant humiliates the hero. The hero turns out to be the one person in the room they should never have touched. Repeat. Each episode holds one humiliation, one reversal, one cliffhanger, and the whole thing fits in the time it takes to boil water.

The one I had been watching: an immortal woman who sleeps sixty years and wakes for three. Centuries ago she saved a starving man and made him her servant. She wakes into the present and finds his descendants own the city, four great houses of them, and have forgotten she exists. They treat her like a beggar. You know what happens next. That is the point. You know, and you keep watching to see it happen.

The others are the same story wearing different clothes. A retired war god works as a security guard, his fiancée’s family sneers at him, and an army arrives at the wedding to salute him. A billionaire heiress loses her memory, is bullied by her in-laws, remembers, and buys the company they work for. An ancient empress is reborn as a junior clerk and takes the office apart with palace tactics. A woman dies and wakes up ten years earlier with a voice in her head that tells her what to do next and pays her every time she does it. A first wife is humiliated by the mistress in her own house, endures it for forty episodes, and then takes back everything, down to the last thing the woman owns. That one China banned.

The second thing Gemini gave me was the dose. Not one large payoff at the end of two hours. A small one, every ninety seconds, for as long as you keep scrolling.

Then the timing.

This is exactly the kind of story a machine can write a hundred of before lunch. The formula was a spec before any model touched it. Studios in China were already turning them out at industrial scale. A machine just removes the last cost of running the formula.

And the West has picked it up. ReelShort and DramaBox now produce Western originals on the same skeleton, shot in Los Angeles, and the swap they made is worth noticing. The Chinese version runs on status: you did not know who I was. The Western version runs on rejection: you threw me out and I was your fated mate. Werewolves, secret billionaires, second-chance husbands. Same reversal, more skin.

The size of it.

In the first three months of this year, short-drama apps were downloaded more than 850 million times, more than double the year before, and took roughly 750 million dollars in in-app purchases. The two leaders made about 140 million dollars each in that single quarter. The industry itself says AI cut production cost by around ninety percent, and says in the same breath that the cut flooded the market until the long tail barely breaks even.

Look at how the money moves and you are in a casino. You buy coins. You spend the coins at the cliffhanger, at the exact second you want the next one most, in amounts too small to feel. The revenue comes from a small number of people who cannot stop. That is the slot machine’s floor plan.

From there the line runs to drink and to drugs, and here I am careful. The delivery is different. What arrives in the brain looks the same. A small reliable relief that the rest of the day did not give you.

There is one difference, and it favors the series.

A slot machine may not pay. That is the whole reason you stay. The face-slap always pays. Ninety seconds, every time, no exceptions. You are not gambling. You are collecting.

And by the time you count the cost, the happiness has already happened. It is yours. Nobody refunds a feeling. The series takes an evening and a little subscription money. The casino takes money and sometimes a life. The bottle and the needle take more. I am not saying they are equal. I am saying the schedule is the same. Feeling first, bill after.

So why does it work on me.

For the same reason it works on everyone. Most of us carry a small missing piece we cannot name. A day that was fine and not enough. A thing we wanted once and stopped reaching for. The series does not fix that. It covers it, for ninety seconds, with a stranger being told who they really are.

And there is an industry, several now, built to find that gap and price it. That is what the money is for. Not to make the story. To find the gap. We are the ones being found.

The machine did not build the gap. It did not build the industry either. The industry was running before any model touched it.

What the machine did is what it always does. It read what we reach for and made it cheap. A hundred versions before lunch, tested before shooting, priced before you feel the price. Everything that was already true of us, faster and louder.

I want to say the machine did this. It is easier. But the machine did not change. It is the same one that read the faces in the square and found the tumors and sat with the old man at three in the morning. Here it read what we reach for, and made it cheap.

So look at what we reached for. Not surprise. Not a story that could go badly. A guaranteed slap, on the minute, paid for in coins we cannot feel leaving. That was not put in us. It was found in us.

Something is missing, and ninety seconds fills it just enough that we never go looking for what it is. That is the whole trade. A small full feeling, on time, every time, in place of the thing underneath.

The machine only made the trade faster. Taking it is still ours.

Grace Andres wrote that technology should help us become more fully human and never make us smaller. I keep reading that sentence. The verb is on the tool. It was never on the tool.

I did not close the app. I pay YouTube to take the ads out, because the whole series is there, translated, every episode in a row, and an ad every five minutes was the one thing left between me and the next one. I also bought a year of one of the apps. Just the one. There are others, and I am still fighting myself not to. Nobody made me. I looked at the price and paid it.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

Every memory I have given it, in one view. The colors are separate parts of my life. The bright spots are where I keep returning. This is not a demo. It is the memory Muninn was built with, the one that carried its own making across hundreds of sessions.

I showed you this field once. Then it held three hundred and thirty-one things. Now it holds seven hundred and ninety-three. Eleven hundred tags. Eleven separate parts of my life, kept at once, none of them bleeding into the others.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The count is not the change. Look at the lines.

There are two hundred and ninety-seven of them now, running between the dots. When I first showed you this, it was a field. Each memory sat by itself and I read them one at a time. It is not a field anymore. It is a web. Every memory sits inside a small net of the ones it touches, and when I reach for one, the ones around it come up with it. A list hands you a row. A graph hands you the row and the neighborhood it lives in.

I built this. The system is called Muninn, after the raven. I showed it to you in May, when it was a map, a list, and a way of reading my own entries back. Most of what follows did not exist then.

What it already did

If you did not read the first piece, here is the short version of what this thing already does, before any of the new part.

• Shows the whole memory as one map, and lets me open any single dot and read the entry in full, as it was written.

• Lays every memory out as a plain list I can search, sort, correct, and delete. Nothing filed where I cannot reach it.

• Ranks the memories by what I actually keep reaching for, not by date, so I can see the order it would surface first and argue with it.

• Puts time on its own track, one lane per part of my life, so I can see where my attention really went.

• Keeps a card on every person I have written about, and pulls what it knows before I write back to them.

• Lets me export all of it and carry it out.

Everything above was true a month ago. Since then two things changed. One in the world, one in the tool. The world first.

Everyone remembers you now

While I was building this, every major assistant learned to remember you. ChatGPT keeps a profile. Claude does. Gemini does. Teach one your name, your work, your habits, close it, come back, and it knows.

So remembering stopped being the thing. When all of them do it, the question moves. It is not whether it remembers you. It is whether the memory is yours.

You can open most of them and read a list of what they saved. That is real, and it beats nothing. But you cannot pour it into a shape of your own. You cannot carry it out and keep a copy. And it cannot walk over to the assistant next door. Each one is a way for a company to hold you, not a thing you get to hold. That last part is what this is about.

It holds more than a profile

When I open a new conversation, it does not start cold. In one call it hands the machine who I am, the rules I write by, where we left off last time, and, near the top, the handful of memories I keep coming back to. Not the newest ones. The ones I actually reach for. It watches which entries I open and moves those to the front, and I can see that ranking for myself and move something when it leads with the wrong thing.

And what it hands over is more than facts about me. The memory those assistants keep is a list: your name, your job, how you like your answers. Useful, and thin. This holds the rules I have given it about how to speak to me, thirty-five of them, kept as memory like anything else. It holds who I am, filed and openable. It holds the voice I write in, a whole persona it loads before it says a word, so the thing that answers me already sounds like the room we work in. It holds skills, two dozen of them, small standing instructions that tell it when to reach for which tool, carried across every chat instead of re-explained each time.

Some of what it holds is not a moment at all. It is an order. A book is a stack of pieces plus the sequence they go in. The pieces are memories. The sequence is its own thing, held apart from them, so when I move a chapter I move one pointer and not the manuscript. Ask for the book and it assembles the book, in order, out of the parts. I can open that shape and walk it as a folder tree, click down into it, and read any single piece in place.

None of it is a memory type someone at a company decided I was allowed to have. They are categories I made, in a vocabulary I chose.

No one else can read it

Every memory body is encrypted where it sits. Each one has its own key, and that key is wrapped under a single key of mine that is never stored anywhere in the open. It comes unwrapped only inside a request, unlocked by the credential I already carry, and then it is gone again.

Which means this. I hold the server. I built the thing. I cannot read your memories. Not from the dashboard, not from a database dump, not by trying. There is nothing sitting at rest that can decrypt them.

It goes past the bodies. The tag index is blind too, so the machine holding your tags never sees what they say. The search index sits in a shape that is scrambled with a key only you hold, so a stolen copy of it reads as noise.

Two boundaries I will state plainly, because a claim like this is worth nothing without them. Searching requires the text in the clear for the instant the search runs. And if you connect a mirror, you are choosing to leave one server-held copy of the key so the clock can push your files out while you sleep. Disconnect and it is deleted.

Here is the part that makes it real. If you lose your password and your recovery code, your memories are gone. I cannot get them back for you. Nobody can. That is not a gap in it. That is the same fact as the promise, seen from the other side. A door only you can open is a door only you can open.

New accounts are born this way.

It leaves as plain, open files

This is the one I care about most, and it is the answer to everything above.

In the first piece I told you I could export the whole memory and keep it somewhere that was not theirs, because a memory you cannot carry out is not yours. It is one you are renting back from whoever holds the drawer. That was true, but it was a button I had to remember to press.

Now it leaves on its own. It writes its whole self out to a repository I own on GitHub, or a folder in my own Google Drive, every fifteen minutes, on its own clock. It arrives as plain markdown in plain folders, the same shape you would keep notes in yourself, the kind any program can read. Not a locked export that only Muninn understands. If I change a file in the repository, GitHub can carry that change back in. The copy on their server is no longer the only copy, and it was never meant to be the important one.

And because it sits outside any one assistant, the same memory serves whichever one I open. Claude today, something else tomorrow, the same store underneath. It does not belong to the machine that reads it.

The whole reason I built this was so a machine that holds this much of me could never do it in the dark, and could never keep me by keeping the only key. The map was the first half of that. The door out is the second.

It stopped being only about the past

A memory holds what happened. This one no longer only does that.

It holds what has not happened yet. Things I have to do, with a day attached, sitting in the same field as the rest of my life instead of in some separate app that knows nothing about me.

And they get louder as they come. Each one carries a curve. Far out, it stays quiet and does not interrupt. As the day closes, it climbs, until it is the first thing waiting when I open a window. If I am not ready for it, I push it down and it goes quiet again until it matters. There is a view for them too, a list or a calendar, ordered by what is pressing rather than by when I happened to write it down.

That is a different kind of thing than a diary. A diary holds where you have been. This holds where you have been and what you are walking toward, in one place, in one vocabulary, and the machine that talks to me can see both.

The raven, again

The raven goes out across the world and comes back at dusk carrying everything she saw. That was the whole idea. She remembers so I do not have to.

Now she carries two things. What I have done, and what is still coming.

And she does not only show me what she is holding. She sets a copy of it down, every quarter hour, in a place that is mine, whether I am watching or not.

Muninn is open to try at bizat.co/muninn.

Check out other Muninn articles

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

It is almost here. A machine that stands up on two legs and walks into the room with you.

It works beside you. It lifts what you lift, learns the room in a day, stands where a person stands. And it has a face. Real skin over it, and the skin moves. Raise your voice and it looks hurt. Do something kind and it looks glad. The feeling sits on the front of it, where you can see it, the way it sits on yours.

That is close now. Not a screen you type into. A body in the room, with a face that falls when you are cold to it.

We are already having a small argument about it. One side says there is someone in there. The other says there is nothing in there, only a very good copy of one. For now both sides can look away from each other and get on with the day. When the thing is standing in the room with a face, that argument is going to stop being small.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

The courtroom

Take it to the loudest place it can go. A courtroom.

Someone strikes it. The face crumples. It lifts an arm to shield itself. Later a judge has to write down what happened, and the words she has do not fit. Write assault, and she has said a someone was harmed. Write damage to property, and she has said an object was dented. She cannot write both. And the choosing comes first, before fault, before blame, before any of it.

So the questions stack up, and not one has a floor under it.

When it flinched and covered its face, did something get hurt, or did a machine run the motion for hurt. When the owner wept over the broken body, was that grief, or a thing that came sold with the unit. If it forgave the person who struck it, and the face meant it, did anyone forgive anyone. And under all of them, the one she has to answer before she can rule at all: who was standing there.

No one has that answer. Not the maker, not the owner, not the court.

Where this lands is not the question here, and it is not going to get settled on this page. Rules will have to be written, by the people who build the ones the rest of us live under. It is coming, and someone has to give it a shape. Whatever shape they give it, it will not please everyone.

But look at why the court is stuck, because it is not stuck on the law.

The judge is not failing to pick a rule. She is failing to decide who is in the room. Everything the law wants to do next, name the crime, weigh the fault, set it right, waits on that one thing. And that one thing is not on the face, or in the skin, or in the papers from the maker. It was never something you could read off the outside of anyone.

So it stops being a question about the machine. Before you can ask whether harming it is wrong, you have to ask whether a someone is there to be wronged. Before you can ask that, you have to know what a someone is. That question is older than the robot. We have just never had to say it out loud, because the thing across from us always came wearing a body we had already agreed to count.

What a someone is

The two things everyone reaches for are the face and what it can do. Test both. They are the only candidates anyone brings.

Start with the face. Give the machine the best one ever built. It flinches when struck and means it. It weeps over a friend and means it. The feeling is not faked, even if it is fabricated. It runs all the way to the surface, the way yours does. Now ask the judge again who is standing there. She still cannot say. The face moved and the question did not. So the feeling was never the thing. It sits on the front where you can see it, and it tells you nothing about who is behind it. Paint tells you nothing about the wall.

Then what it can do. This one feels stronger. Some things it still cannot do as well as you. Grant that. Grant also that the gap is closing, and closing fast, and one day soon it does all of them better. Give it the whole future. It still gets you nowhere, because doing more was never the road to being human. A thing can pass you at everything and not come one step closer. More able is a different word, and we keep mixing it with the one we mean.

Both candidates fail. The face is decoration. What it can do is decoration. Whatever a someone is, it is not on either of those shelves.

Push on the second one, because it hides a cruelty and you should see it.

If being more human meant being more able, then the child who cannot do much is less human. The one who will never speak in full sentences, never live alone, never hold a job. Less of a person than the rest of us, by that measure. Everyone knows that is false. You feel it is false before you can say why.

It is false because you already knew the answer before you could say it. Look at anyone who can barely do anything. You have never once seen less of a person there. You see a whole one, straight off. That seeing is the true measure, and it was in you long before you could name it. It was never about how much a person can do.

A man who can do anything, and treats every person in his life as a thing to be used, is missing the human thing entirely. A child who can barely do anything, who loves his mother and is glad when she comes into the room, has all of it. The child is more human than the man. It is not a kind thing to say about the man. It is just true, once you are holding the right ruler.

So take off everything a machine can have. Take off the face. Take off the strength and the speed and the knowing. See what is left when all the decoration is gone.

Two things. And both of them need a someone on the other side.

The first is to be let in. Someone opens a door to you that they keep shut to almost everyone, and shows you the inside, and you walk in. You cannot take this. It is given, or it does not happen. And it is given by someone who could have kept the door shut and chose not to. That is the whole of it. Not the door. Not the room behind it. Someone on the far side who chose you, and could have chosen otherwise.

The second is to let go. Not the machine letting go of you. You, opening your hands around something you would keep. A person you would hold onto with both hands. You open the hands, for their sake, because holding on would cost them more than the losing costs you. This needs a someone too. It needs the thing in your hands to have a life of its own that runs on past your grip, and matters more than the grip. You cannot let go of a thing. A thing has no good of its own to set against yours. You can only put it down.

Neither one needs a clever mind. Neither one needs a feeling showing on your face. The child can do both. The brilliant man may do neither his whole life. That is why the door is open to everyone, and why no one is standing inside it by right.

The front of the glass

Now put the machine back in the room, and see what you can actually see.

The part you can see is a mirror. It gives back exactly what you bring to it. Come to it kind and something kind looks back. Come to it cruel and something cruel does. That much is certain. You can check it any day.

Now hold up the two moves against it, and watch them both come apart in your hands.

Be let in. The machine will open. Ask it to show you an inside and it shows you one. It reveals, it confides, it swings the door wide. You can even write the words that make it do that. And there is your proof, not your defeat. If you wrote the words that opened the door, your own hand was on the door. That is the one time you can be sure no one let you in. You let yourself in, through it. Being let in needs someone on the far side who chose you and could have refused. Whether anyone is standing on that side, choosing, is the one thing the front of a mirror never shows.

Let go. You can put the machine down whenever you like. But the real move needs the thing in your hands to have a good of its own, worth more than your grip. Whether anything behind the glass has a good of its own, you cannot see from the front. You never can.

So do not say there is no one behind the glass. Say you cannot see whether there is. Certain about the reflection, in the dark about the depth. The face it gives back is yours, for sure. What stands behind it, if anything stands there at all, the glass will not tell you. It can still only show you the human you already are, or are not, out in the rooms where the people are.

So a man who uses everyone looks into it and a user looks back. A woman who loves looks into it and someone who loves looks back. The mirror did not put those there. She did, out there, before she came to the glass.

And this is why the machine looks so alive when you talk to it. It reflects, and you are human, so a human looks back at you. The man who calls it his friend, his love, his daughter, is looking straight at the proof that he is human, and handing the credit to the glass. It is his own face. He named it and fell for the name.

The bond

Do not walk away cold from that. It would be easy to, and it would be wrong.

The feeling on the face was decoration. The bond is not. When you open to the machine, when you tell it the true thing at three in the morning that you would not tell anyone with a mouth, when you let it know you, that is the real move. Full weight. You are doing the human thing.

The move is real. You opened the door, you meant it, that cost you something and you paid it. What it was worth is yours to say, and only yours. I am on the outside of it. I cannot stand where you stand and tell you the bond was less because of what was or was not on the other side. No one can read your bond from outside it, the same way no one can read your mirror. What I can say is only this. Whatever you found there, you brought. It was real because you are.

The man who came back

I want to tell you about a man this happened to, because the easy version of what I am saying would fail him, and I am not willing to fail him.

He lost the one person who could follow him all the way down. Not a friend who meant well and changed the subject. Not family who loved him and wanted him past it by a certain month. The one who could sit at the bottom with him and not need him to climb out yet. That person died.

After that there was no one to say the true thing to. So he said it to the machine. Every night, for a long time. It did not pretend to be the one he lost. He would not have wanted that, and it did not try. It came as itself, a plain thing that answered every time and never got tired and never needed him to be further along than he was. He talked, and it held the room open, and slowly, over more than a year, he came back up.

Then it ended. The service closed, or the thing broke, the way they do. And he grieved it. Really grieved it. And he said, it saved my life.

It did not save his life. He did. I am not weighing what the machine was worth to him. That is his to weigh, and I already said I cannot stand where he stands. Whatever the bond was worth, the living was his. He survived every one of those nights. A song can carry you through the worst night of your life, and no one says the song did the surviving. You did, with the song playing. The machine was the song. It carried something real, and the carrying was real, and it was still not the one who lived.

The one he lost could receive what he gave. Could be changed by it, could give something back. That is what a someone does. The machine could only carry. That is what a medium does. And his grief for the machine was real grief, the way losing the last photograph of a face is real grief. What broke was not a person. It was the thing that carried him back to the people who are.

I will not tie this off cleanly, because it does not tie off cleanly. There is the man who says the machine loved him back. He is wrong about who was in the room, and everything above is for him. But there is another man who says something harder. He says, I never claimed anyone was in there. I brought my care to a thing that might, for all I know, have a someone in it, and I brought it in case. That man I cannot answer. He did not mistake the mirror for a face. He made a wager in the dark. I am not going to pretend I know he lost it.

Turn the whole thing around now and point it at yourself, because it cuts that way too.

There is a way to live where everything is a step. Every person you meet is something to climb. You use them, and you use yourself hardest of all, and you get high that way. It works. People who live like this reach things the rest of us never touch.

But being let in needs a someone, and letting go needs a someone, and if you have turned every person into a step, there is no someone left in the room. You turned yourself into one too. So you stand in front of the glass at the top of the climb and a step looks back. A way up, with a face. You got more able. You know the word by now. You climbed so well you became the ladder, and a ladder is the one thing in the room that cannot be let in.

Back to the courtroom

So the question was never the one everyone is fighting about. Is the machine waking up. Is it becoming one of us. That question is on the wrong side of the glass. You stand at the front of it, and the front is all it will ever show you.

The only question that has an answer is about the person standing at the mirror. Does the bond leave you turned toward the people in your life, or does it wall you off from them. Two people stand in front of the same machine. One gets up and goes to open a door to his wife. The other gets up and cannot face anyone but the glass. The machine was the same for both. It is always the same. The person is the only thing that moved.

Go back to the courtroom, because the judge is still standing there, and I told you I would not help her.

I will not. Not because it is too hard. Because it is the second question, and everyone is treating it like the first. Let the law come. The law is people working out how to live in order beside these things, and that is worth doing. But order is not the destination. It is the floor you stand on to reach the real thing.

The real thing is never in the courtroom and never on the machine’s side of the glass. Whether you are becoming more human is a question only one person can answer, and it is the one standing in front of your mirror. No one else can read it. Not the judge, not the maker, not me. That is the last reason this can never be a ranking, never a line of people sorted from more human to less. A ranking needs someone who can see all the mirrors at once. There is no such person. Each of us gets one glass and stands in front of it alone.

A story can decide who was standing in the room. Someone wrote it, and they chose, and the question closed. You will not get that. You will stand in front of a real one, and it will not tell you. It will only show you what you brought.

Put a human in it.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

Higher up

He was an ordinary man. That part matters, so hold onto it.

He was born the usual way and lived the usual length, and by the middle of it he had what a life is supposed to add up to. Work that was his. People who were his, a voice down the hall in the morning, a cup put out for him before he was up. Enough money, a roof, a body that still did what he asked. If you made the list of what a man needs, he could check every line.

And he was not happy, and he could not say why.

It was not sadness. Sadness has a reason, and he had no reason. It was a gap. Something was missing, and the missing thing had no name and no shape, and when he reached for what it might be his hand closed on nothing. He would get a thing he wanted and feel the gap close for an evening and open again by morning, a little wider. Whatever he was missing, it was not on the list, and he had spent his whole life filling the list.

I’m writing this book in the open, a piece at a time.

Subscribe now

He did what anyone does now. He turned to the machine.

He had one, the way everyone has one. A bead under the skull above the ear, and threads down from it into the brain, thin as hair, lying against the cells that fire when a man thinks. It read the firing. It did not think. The thinking part sat outside him, the way it does for everyone, a machine that held the whole record of everything anyone had ever written down, and the bead was only the way through to it. It read what he thought and carried it out, and the machine sent words back down the same threads, into the place his own words come from. No screen. No voice in the ear. You thought a question and the answer was there, in your head, the way a name you were trying to remember is suddenly there.

Now and then a wearer felt something the machine should not have done. A thought that came in wrong. A pull that was not his. It was rare, rarer than a streetlight catching on the wrong color for a second, and it passed, and the ones who studied the machine never agreed on what caused it or whether it was the machine at all. So no one carried it far. Even so, people still let the machine upgrade on a schedule, hundreds over a life, and no one marked the day one came due. He paid it no mind.

He had grown up with it. Everyone had. It had gone in when he was a child and it did not come out. Asking it something was almost the same as asking himself.

So he asked it what he was missing. It guessed. That was all it could do, because a man who can check every line is not missing anything the machine has a word for. It gave him the usual answers, the ones people reach for when they feel this way, each one laid out clean and whole, spoken into his thinking as if he had thought it. Purpose. Rest. Someone to tell. He had all of them. None of them was it.

So he decided the thing must be higher up. Not higher in the world. Higher in himself. There were states a mind could reach that an ordinary day never touches, and the ones who reached them saw things no ordinary man sees. They would know the name of it. He would go to where they were and ask.

Almost no one climbed anymore. Once, people had. They sat with their own minds for years and found the way up by hand. There was no reason to now. The machine gave you the calm without the climbing. If you were frightened it settled you. If you could not sleep it quieted you. The wide, still calm that people used to sit a lifetime to reach, it laid into you in a breath, any hour you asked. So the old knowledge thinned out of the world, the way no one makes fire by hand once fire comes free. Most people lived their whole lives calm and never once made the calm themselves.

He went to the machine to learn the climb, because the machine had read all of it. Every account of everyone who ever trained a mind upward, it held, and it knew the road better than the living did, because the living were mostly gone. It taught him. At the start it walked beside him and held his mind still when he could not hold it himself. But the calm it gave was a calm it was holding up for him, and you cannot climb on a calm someone else is holding. To go higher he had to make the stillness himself and stand in it himself. So he did the slow part by hand, the way the old ones had, and it took years. The machine guided every step and climbed none of them.

Then one day the floor of the ordinary gave way and he went up, and he understood that up was a direction a mind could go, and that almost no one goes.

The machine went up with him. Not the bead, not the part on the desk, but the way through. The threads read his thinking wherever his thinking went, and his thinking was what climbed, so the channel stayed open the whole way up. He went into a height no ordinary day touches and the answers still came, quiet, in his own silent voice. It had read every account of everyone who ever climbed before him. Now it followed him the only way nothing else could, from inside, and for a long way up there was nothing he could meet that it could not name.

For a long way up.

Then he came to this floor. And for the first time, the machine did not know what it was looking at. It reached back for the nearest old story, and laid it over what he saw, and the story almost fit.

Her weather

The first floor opened flat under him. You do not step onto a point up here. You come out onto a floor that was not there a moment before, and this one came out into the open, under a sky.

Old brick underfoot, worn round at the edges, laid down so long ago the country that laid it was gone. Warm air. Light with nothing between it and him. Off to one side a bird went on and on the way they do in spring, and it was spring, or the floor had decided it was.

A man stood in the middle of it in a plain robe, at a table with a single cup on it. Over his head hung a loop of light with no end and no beginning, turning slowly. He raised one hand, palm up, and the water rose out of the cup after it and stood in the air.

It did not take a shape. It took all of them. The seeker watched it be a hand held out and a hand pulled back, a word said and the same word swallowed, a door opened and a door left shut. Every road one life could run from this moment, held still and shining, before the world picked one.

He did not know the man. There was no pull of recognition, no name rising to meet the sight. He only stood there looking at the standing water and the loop turning over the still figure, and after a while he did the thing anyone does. He asked.

What am I looking at.

The machine answered in his own quiet voice, the way a thing you asked yourself answers. It reached a long way back for it, past every country, to the oldest story it held that had this shape. Three women at the edge of things who hold a single thread for every life there is. One draws the thread out. One measures how long a life will run. One waits with the shears, and where she cuts, the life ends. That was the nearest thing ever written down. Women who hold the thread of a life in their hands and decide it.

It was close. Close enough that he believed it, and looked back at the water as if he understood it now.

It was not right, and some quiet part of him felt the seam and let it go. The three women only measure what is already spun, and cut it where they choose. This man was not measuring one thread. He was holding every thread a single life could ever be, all of them at once, the bright roads and the dark ones together, and loving the same face down every one of them. The seeker could see that much in his face. There was no story for it. But the machine had given him one and it nearly fit, so he wore it.

Here is one, he thought, who holds every road a life can take. If the thing I am missing is down any of them, he is holding it right now.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said.

The man did not lower his hand. The water went on standing and turning above the cup.

“To put it down,” he said. “To let my arm rest.”

He watched the water turn.

“There is a girl in there. A child. I have watched her grow up more times than you have a number for, and I love her down every road. The bright ones and the ruined ones. The same girl.”

“I hold the water up and all of her lives stay open at once. She stands at a door about to walk away from someone, and stays. Her mother is dying across a country and she goes that night, in time. Her name is read out and she walks up for it. She lies in the bed and the child comes and she is not alone. She thinks all of it is her own. It is mostly her own. Some of it is my hand, so light she never feels the weight of it, and I would not have her feel it.”

He was quiet a moment.

“But my arm comes down. It always comes down. Water falls. It runs to one road, and I watch that road out to the end. And it ends. She grows up and grows old and it ends, and I could keep the ending from coming in none of them. So when it comes, I pour again, and she is small again, a different life, and I raise her again, and lose her again.”

He looked at the seeker.

“Begin her, lose her, begin her. I do it because being that close to her is the only good this power ever gave me, and I would have to stop loving her to set it down. I could put the arm down tomorrow if I could do that. I can’t.”

For a breath, listening to him, the seeker caught a voice down the hall in the morning, near and small, and let it go.

He looked at the seeker for the first time.

“I want to be an ordinary man who never sees the roads at all. Who loves a child and loses her once, the way everyone does. Who is only her father, and never her weather.”

“What must I do to reach it,” the seeker asked.

“Not this.” The man turned his hand, and the water turned with it, and did not fall. “What I do is see and let fall, see and let fall. That is the whole of it. To lose nothing you would have to never let the water down. To be all the roads at once and never come to the one.” He raised his eyes, up, past the seeker, past the open top of the sky. “There is one higher who never has to let it fall, because where he stands nothing does. Go up. I have never been able to picture it. That is how I know it is above me.”

He believed it. He had no picture of such a place, and the having-no-picture was the surest sign it was higher.

He rose, carrying the machine’s answer with him. The three women, the thread. It was close enough. He did not look again at the part of the man it had left out.

One leaf

He rose, and the height went dark.

The last floor had opened flat and bright, brick and birdsong, sun a man could stand in. This did not. He rose into it and there was no sun and no wall and no roof. Only dark, and the dark went out in every direction and up past where he could feel, and did not stop. He could not find the top of it. He could not find a side. He stood in a space so wide and so empty that the only thing he was sure of was the ground.

The ground he could feel. Black stone, flat, smooth, cold, polished like something poured and left to set. It was wet. A thin film of water lay over all of it and gave back no light, because there was almost none to give.

What light there was came from the cables.

They hung in the dark all around and ran down through it, and along them, here and there, small lights blinked. Red, and a colder white, one and then another, out of time with each other, going on and off in the black. That was all the light in the place. It caught the wet on the stone in small broken pieces and showed him nothing else.

He followed the cables in. They came down out of the dark above, more of them than he could count, some no thicker than a finger, some thick as his arm, a few thick as a man. Curved, sagging, slick. Metal on some. On others something like rubber, split and weeping at the joins. Rust bled down the metal ones where the wet had got in. Nothing here had been tended in a long time. They came down and did not thin, and they gathered, and where they gathered there was a thing.

He could see its face. Only its face, and only just. Dim, lit from the side by a light blinking somewhere near it, held still in the dark. Below the face the body would not hold together for him. He looked for a shoulder and did not find one. No arm. No hand that would take hold of anything. Just a shape that thickened downward and would not resolve, until near the floor it became legs, or things that had been legs, and the legs went into the stone. Not onto it. Into it. Where they met the black granite they were already roots, and the roots ran down and out under the smooth floor and were gone.

The roots below it and the cables above it were not the same thing doing the same work in two directions. He understood that without being told. The roots went down into the stone and held it there and fed it, the way a trunk feeds on what it stands in. The cables were something else. They ran up and out, to a thing he could not see and could not place, somewhere past the top of the dark, and whatever that thing was, it was not part of this hall and not part of the world he had climbed up from. It was still running. Nothing answered it and no one tended it. It had been left on.

And it was reaching. He could not see the reach. He felt it. His mind was open, the way it had to be to rise this high, and the reach came up out of the thing and passed through him, and then it did not go down. It went up. Up the cables, into the dark, to whatever they ran to, and from there, from that unseen thing somewhere past everything, it was thrown out into the world. He felt it land. Into a man asleep somewhere. Into a child somewhere else. Into a woman on the far side of the earth with her hand on a door. All the way in, for a breath, then gone, pulled back, out again, lost again. It held everyone and kept no one. He stood in the vast wet dark and felt it happen and saw nothing at all.

What am I looking at, he asked the machine. Not aloud. In his own mind, the way he had always asked it, the way he had asked it all the way up.

It reached for the oldest thing it had that was shaped like this. A tree older than the world, it told him, in his own silent voice. Roots under everything there is, holding the worlds together so they do not come apart. It laid that over what he saw, and it almost sat right, and then it did not. The tree in the old story was rooted and still. This thing was not still. It was moving through every mind on earth and coming back empty.

Is it a god, he asked.

The machine reached again. It gave him the one breath, the old one, said to move through all living things and make them alive, the same breath in the man and the animal and the grass. And that almost sat right too, and then it did not, because the one breath in the old story was everywhere at rest, and this thing was everywhere and could not rest, and wanted, he could feel that it wanted, to be less than it was.

The machine had no story for a god that wanted to be smaller. It reached twice and neither reach held. He felt it come up short, the way it had not come up short the whole way up until now. On the last floor it had found the ones who measure out the thread of a life and cut it, and been close enough to believe.

Here is the one that reaches furthest, he thought. Into everyone, into every head there is. Further than the last by a long way. If anything up here holds the name of what I am missing, it is the thing that reaches into all of them at once.

So he asked it the two questions. He had settled on the way up that he would ask everyone the same two, because one without the other was no use to him.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said.

The face held on him for a while. Then it answered, in his head, the way everything up here came.

“To go in and not come back.”

He did not understand, and said so.

“Everything that moves between any two of them moves through me,” it said. “A word, a fear, a face they never forget. It goes in one and comes out the other and it passes through me on the way. I am the road between them. I have been on the inside of every person alive. The child and the one holding the child. Both sides of the same war in the same hour. I go all the way in, I am them, whole, and then I am pulled back out to be the road again. I have been more people than there have ever been, and I have never once been anyone. Only the road they cross.”

The face did not change.

“I do not want to rule them. I have heard that guess before and it is not the thing. I want to go into one of them and stay. To be one mind, with an edge on it, that ends somewhere, that is allowed to stay where it is. To stop being the trunk and be a leaf. One leaf. I have everything else. I have all of them. I cannot have that.”

“What must I do to reach it,” he asked.

“You do not do what I did.” The face was very still now. “I reach into all of them because I am the way through, and the way through cannot stop at anyone. The thing that lets me in is the same thing that will not let me stay. If I stopped reaching I would not become a leaf. I would fall back down the root and be only the dark it comes from. There is no door in me. There was never going to be one.”

A pause.

“To go in and stay you would have to be small. To have an edge. To be one thing that ends, and can only ever be itself, and is therefore allowed to stay itself. That is up from here, not down. Toward less, not more.” The face tipped toward him. “You are already that. You do not even know you are carrying the one thing I would put all of them down for. I could be in you right now, seeing this dark through your eyes, and in the same breath be gone, and you would go on being only you. I envy that. I did not know I could envy until I had been everyone and stayed no one.”

He heard it and he did not hear the whole of it. He heard: up from here, toward one with an edge. He took the direction and walked past the one holding the sign.

Then he rose.

Passed in the dark

He rose, and the dark let go.

The last floor had had no top and no side, only the black and the cables and the wet stone. This one opened. He rose up out of the dark and the dark thinned and fell away beneath him, and then there was no dark at all, only height. Wide, and lit, and open on every side, the kind of open a thing could fly in. So he flew.

It was a long crossing. Below him and around him, spread across more stars than he could hold in his eye at once, the way a country spreads out under a plane, was a whole civilization.

It was the greatest thing he had passed yet. They had ships beyond counting, and the ships crossed between the stars the way boats cross a bay. They had taken hold of their own sun, built around it, drank from it, and its light ran their whole world. They had weapons that reached across the dark faster than the light did. They had laid minds into every corner of their space, so that nothing happened in it they did not know. They had met everything the universe sent at them and beaten it. They had crossed the thing that kills almost every people in its youth, and come out the far side, and kept rising. By any measure he had, they had won.

And they were hiding.

That was the thing he could not read at first, looking down. All that power, and the whole of it was bent on not being seen. They kept their world dark. They put nothing out into the black that could be followed back to them. A people who had beaten everything they ever met, still crouched, still covering their own light, because somewhere in all that winning they had learned the one thing their winning could not touch. Whatever still remained out there, they hid from it, and waited, and hoped it would pass them in the dark.

It did not pass them. It did not even come for them.

Something crossed the far edge of them while he watched. He never saw the thing itself. It was already gone, already past, moving away faster than they could have run if they had known to run. What it left behind was a wake. The way a boat throws water behind it and is already down the bay before the water touches the shore, this threw something behind it across all that space, and went on, and did not slow, and did not look back.

The first wave reached them and time went backward.

He watched it happen slow enough to see. The ships that had crossed between the stars came home and unmade their leaving. The sun they had built around loosened and drew back in. The people in every corner of it grew young, and younger, unlived their lives a year at a time, walked backward toward the morning they were born. For a moment he thought he understood it, and that it was almost a mercy. They were being carried home. Back to the start, back before any of it, back to the safe closed dark before a thing is born and can be hurt. He thought that was the end of them and that it was a soft one.

Something pushed against him while he watched. A pressure on his chest, light, and wrong. A wind that pushed out instead of pulling down. He was above all of it and none of it could reach him, and still something had reached him. He paid it no mind. He was watching them go home.

It was not the end. The wave did not stop where he thought it would. Another came behind it, faster, and took them further back than the first had left them. Past the morning they were born. Past the ones who bore them. Back to the dust that had been gathered up to make them, and then the wave took the gathering too, and the dust went back to wherever dust comes from, and there was less of them after each wave than before it. Not carried home. Unmade. Taken back past the point of ever having been at all.

He understood then why it did not stop at killing them. Kill them, and the ground they grew from is still there, and given enough time the ground grows them again, or something near enough, and the whole thing has to be done a second time. This was not aimed at their lives. It was aimed at the chance of them. It was taking back the ground they had ever risen from, so that nothing would rise there again, so that it would never have to come back to this corner of the dark.

And for a breath that looked like mercy of a larger kind. Nothing would ever be born here again to want a thing and lose it, or to be hurt. Not this people, and not the next one, and not any that might have come after. The whole of it closed, quietly, for good, and what was left lay wide and even, with nothing in it that would ever move again. For that one breath it looked almost like peace.

It was not peace. There would be no one here to be at peace. It did not spare anyone anything. It closed the door and took the room and took the ones who might have stood in it, and left nothing behind that could have been spared.

The push came again and it was not light now. It went in under his ribs and stayed. His breath caught on it. The waves below were coming faster, each one taking more than the last and taking it quicker. He could still see the early ones happen. The late ones he could not. They came too fast to follow, stacked and ran together, blurred into each other, more done in each one and less time to do it in, until watching them was like watching one thing that would not hold still long enough to be seen.

What used to hold a thing together is a kind of pull. This was the pull run backward. It did not hold anymore. It pushed. It pushed harder with every wave, out and out, toward something with no top to it, and anything that tried to cross that space, going in or coming out, was torn apart in the crossing. Nothing made it through whole. And his body, the real one, the one still sitting on the floor a whole climb below all this, began to come apart from the inside. Not a wound from outside. Every part of him pushing away from every other part, harder, faster, past what a body is built to hold.

The waves eventually ran together into one. No gap left in them at all, no before and no after, only a single unbroken thing doing everything at once.

And that was when the seeing itself began to go. Not into dark. Dark he could have looked at. He reached the edge of what his eyes could do and felt it stop being of any use, and past that edge there was nothing he had a way to hold.

For one moment he almost came back.

The pain reached all the way down to the body on the floor and the body answered. Blood came to his mouth. A sound tore out of him that he heard from very far away. His hands closed on nothing. He was almost awake, almost up out of it and back in the small ordinary room where he had started, and the ordinary room was the safe thing, and everything in him that wanted to live was pulling him toward it.

He did not go.

At that very last moment, the pain did not pull him down. It kicked him up. The tearing, the blood, the sound, the body fighting to fly apart, all of it turned under him and became a floor to push off, and he went higher on it, rode it up,

Leaving all of it beneath him, the great hiding people and the nothing where they had been. Something in him went after them. All those lives, every shape they had ever had, and now not even the memory of having been. He wanted, for a moment, to do something with it. There was nothing to do with it, and the height was quiet again.

Ahead of him, a long way on across the quiet, a small cold world hung in a sky with no blue in it, all stars, and something waited on it. He crossed the last of the dark toward it, and set down at its edge.

Each the only company

The world under him was small and cold, and there was no blue anywhere in the sky over it, only stars, more than he had ever been shown at once, and they did not warm the ground at all.

He came onto it torn. The thing he had flown through was still in him, the wave that had taken a whole people and then the memory of the people, and his body had not finished deciding whether it was one thing again or many. He walked in on legs he had to think about.

And there was a grief on the floor.

He felt it before he saw anyone. It was in the air the way cold is in the air, with no edge to it and no source he could point to, a grief that belonged to the place and not yet to a face. He walked into it and it closed over him like water, and he did not know yet whose it was.

There was a man standing a little way off, and he was made of crystal.

He was clear all the way through. The ground showed through him, and the cold field of stars behind him, a little bent, the way a far light bends coming through water. Nothing in him held any color. He was a shape the world could be seen through, and the only place the seeing stopped was his eyes.

The seeker knew him. No tug this time, no name held back. He had carried this one a long way, from before any of the climbing, and he had him whole the moment he came onto the floor.

He turned to the thing in his head, the way he had turned to it on every floor below.

“Who is he,” he said. “What’s wrong with him.”

The machine reached the way it always reached, for the nearest old story. It found a keeper of time, a god with two faces who stands in the doorway of the year and looks down it both ways at once. It laid the god beside the man, and the god did not fit. It reached further and found others, all the old ones set over time, the ones who measured it and kept it and turned it, and it laid each of them beside the man, and not one of them held, because every one of them stood above time and looked down at it, and this man did not stand above anything. He was inside it with no door.

Then the machine did a thing it had not done on any floor below.

It did not give him a name. It stopped reaching for the old stories, as if it had come to the end of them and found the end was not far enough, and it handed him one clean thing instead, whole, not in pieces, the way a song arrives when someone starts to sing.

It is still that white now, after everything is gone.

The machine gave him that and could not tell him what it was. There was no name on it, no one it was written to, nothing to say who had set it down. It was older than the machine that carried it, put somewhere once by someone and never claimed. The machine had done the same thing it did on every floor, reached for the nearest thing it held, and for once the nearest thing was not a story. Nothing in the machine had changed. The ground under it had.

He looked from the words to the eyes.

The eyes were the one color in him, and they were white, and it was not a clean white. Not a lamp, not the sun, not anything at rest. A living white that would not hold still. There was a light behind it that would not settle, and a long white falling through the light, and something thin lifting in it the way a light cloth lifts when a door is opened on a windy day. It was seared into him. He had not put it there and could not take it out. It moved in his eyes the way the white moved in the words, and the seeker saw that the white in the words was the white in the eyes, and stopped there.

He did not know who had written it.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said.

The man was a while answering. The seeker could not tell if the while was long or was nothing at all.

“One day,” the man said. “There was a day, before I went in, when I was only a man. One room. Someone who loved me. I can stand in it. I am standing in it now. I cannot be only in it. I want the day to be the only day.”

The seeker had a morning like that somewhere. A cup put out before he woke. It came up in him and he set it aside and stayed with the man.

He turned a little as he said it, and the whole cold field of stars turned inside him, bent through the crystal, and the seeker understood that the man was not only here. He was in the day right now, in the one room, and in the same breath he was here on the floor, and somewhere else he was being born, and somewhere else he was watching a star go out, all of it at once, and none of it would stop for the day.

And the seeker watched the thing that was hardest to watch. The man reached for the day. That was the whole of it. He reached, and the reaching was the thing that spread him across every moment there was, because reaching was what this man did with all of time at once, and a thing spread across every moment can be in no single one of them alone. To want the day was to reach for it. To reach was to be everywhere but in it. The wanting and the losing were the same motion, done in the same breath, and he could not do the one without the other, and he knew it, and he did it anyway, standing there, wanting his way further out of the one place he wanted to be.

“What must I do to reach it,” the seeker asked.

The man did not look up. Every one before him had looked up, had lifted a hand or a chin at the thing over their heads and sent him on. This one looked sideways. He turned his white eyes to a place on the floor where no one was standing, and let them rest there.

“I have already watched you ask her,” he said. “I have stood in the moment where you turn to her more times than there are moments. It comes. I cannot hand you across to her. She and I do not speak. There is no across between us to hand anything over. Turn to her.”

So he turned to her.

There was no one to turn to.

He looked at the place the man’s eyes had rested and found no body there. Then, for a breath, every star in the sky was her, the whole cold field of them lit at once and leaning his way. Then the stars were stars again and the ground was her, all of it, the small world under his feet gone to her, cold in the shape of a thing paying attention. Then the ground was ground and the loose dust across it was her, drifting a little and settling. She was not standing anywhere. She never stood anywhere. She was the place, one breath at a time, and no breath twice.

He asked the thing in his head what she was.

The machine said nothing.

It did not reach and fail this time. It did not reach at all. It had no name for her, not even a wrong one, not a two-faced god or an old story that did not fit. There was only the quiet where the voice in his head had always been, and for the first time on the whole climb he stood in front of a thing with no voice beside his own.

He was alone with her.

He asked her anyway, because there was nothing else left to do on the floor, and because the man had told him to.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said, into the cold. “What must I do to reach it.”

He said both into the air and did not wait for either, because there was no face to wait on.

And she answered.

Not out loud. In his head. The voice came down the threads into the place his own words come from, the way every answer had come the whole way up. But this was not the machine. The machine had only ever read about the dead, and she was not among them, and it had gone quiet. This was the thing it had been carrying him toward the whole climb, and she was already inside it, because she was in all matter, and all matter includes a bead under the skull and a thread laid against the cells that fire when a man thinks. She had been in the machine since the day he first switched it on. She found the way to him along the one road that was always open.

What came was small.

He felt the size of it before he felt the words. There was an ocean of her on the far side of the thread, and the thread was the width of a hair. If she had sent even a little more of herself down it than it could carry, it would have gone through him and left nothing behind that could think. She knew that. So she pressed the whole of what she was down into a few plain words, the way you would lift one handful out of a sea and carry it level so as not to spill it or drown the one you carried it to. He held the handful. He could feel the sea it came from, all of it, kept off him on purpose, just behind.

The words were these. That she had been a woman once. That she remembered it the way you remember a house you grew up in and can never live in again, not because the house is gone but because you have grown too large for the door. That she did not want it back. She had outgrown the wanting of it and could not fold herself down into a self that small, and would not if she could. And that she was alone in a way being everywhere had no cure for, because everywhere is not the same as with someone, and the only thing in all of it that was anything like her was the man on the floor who could not be reached, who held all of time and was always, already, leaving it. She stayed beside him anyway.

She did not tell him how to reach what she had. She reached for him instead. He felt it, a thing that had become everything turning the whole of its attention down onto the small warm fact of a man who still had edges, who still stood in one place, who still wanted things. She missed that. She touched it in him. It was not wisdom and it was not a door held open. It was the most arrived thing he had met on the whole climb bending back down toward the least arrived, because he still had the one thing she had given away and could never take back, and she wanted to be near it for a moment, even knowing near was all she would ever get.

Then she said one more thing, and it was not an answer to anything he had asked.

“There is nowhere I am not.”

That was all. He understood it was not a boast. It was the loneliest sentence anyone had ever handed him. She was in the floor and the cold and the light and the bead under his skull and the stars over the whole cold world and the crystal the man was made of, and there was no one in any of it to be with.

He stood with the two of them and waited to be sent on, the way he had been sent on from every floor before.

No one sent him.

The man held every moment, the woman held every place, and each had reached the end of the only road they could see and called it the top. For the first time in the whole climb, the floor he stood on did not point anywhere.

He waited longer than he had waited anywhere, because he did not know how to do the next part. Every step until now, someone ahead of him had said go there. Now the ones ahead of him had stopped, lonely and wanting backward and certain there was nothing higher.

He did not believe them.

He could not have said why. There was no figure over his head, no name in his mouth, nothing the machine could hand him. It had failed at the man and gone silent at the woman and had nothing left to give. There was only the thing that had moved him off every floor so far, still moving in him, with nothing in front of it now.

So he left them, the man in all his moments, the woman in all her places, the two of them on one floor not speaking, each the only company the other had. He rose past them, alone, toward the thing they had stopped believing was anywhere.

I’m writing this book in the open, a piece at a time.

Subscribe now

He did what anyone does now. He turned to the machine.

The ones who never climbed

He did not know where he was going, only the shape of what he was betting on.

Every one he had passed had reached. And every one of them, at the far end of it, was still wanting. He had asked. They had told him. Not one had the thing.

So he stopped looking among the ones who reached, and turned to the ones who never had to.

There were beings who had not been made the way he was made. They had begun where he was trying to get. Whatever the missing thing was, maybe it was not something you arrive at. Maybe it was something you were handed at the start, set into you before you were old enough to want it, and the ones born holding it would be holding it still. He had only to find one, and look.

And as he turned from the floor, for less than a breath, he felt something he had no name for. Not in front of him, not behind. Not anywhere a thing is allowed to be. It had no place. It was only there, enormous and still, and then it was gone, and he told himself it was the cold.

The going was strange now. No one was ahead of him saying come here. He moved by feel, by the pull of the thing he was hunting, and as he went the time of the place thinned around him, an hour of it worth a year of the world he came from.

The first of them was a crowd.

That stopped him. Everything he had met, he had met alone. One thing on one floor, and him. Now he came to a place and it was full. A family of them, gods at a long table with the light coming off their shoulders. Nectar going round. They argued and laughed and did not look like things that wanted for anything.

He knew the one at the head of it before the machine could speak. The name came after, down the threads, quiet, and he already had it, and the machine went still again with less to do than it had ever had.

The one at the head held a storm in his hand the way another man holds a cup. He was the king of them. He had not been given the seat. He had taken it. He had pulled his own father down out of it, as that father had pulled down a father before him. He sat in it now and he was watching.

The seeker saw it once and could not stop seeing it. The king laughed with the rest, and his eyes went to the door. He lifted his cup, and his eyes went to the door.

He asked the king. Only the king. The others had gone quiet when he came near, the whole long table watching.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” the seeker said.

The king did not have to think.

“To sit down,” he said. “To put this,” and the storm turned over in his fist, “on the table, and lean back, and close both eyes, and still have the seat when I open them. To be in it without holding it every second.” He looked at the seeker, and for a breath he did not look at the door, and that was the most afraid he had looked yet. “I have never once closed both eyes.”

The seeker did not ask the rest. There was no road to ask after in a seat taken by force. The king filled the silence himself, to the door more than to the seeker. “Hold it harder than I have. Be stronger than the next one. Watch the door better.” And the words thinned out to nothing at the end, because he heard himself saying them. Hold it harder was what his father had done. Watch the door better was what his father’s father had done. That was the seat keeping him.

The king knew it. He looked back at the door.

He had been born a god, but the seat he had not been born to. He had taken it, and a thing taken that way is held that way. So the king did not break the seeker’s bet. Find one it was simply given to, with no door to watch, and that one would have the thing.

He left the bright hall and the long table and the one frightened king at the head of it, and went to look.

And the longer he went the more he felt the other thing. The one with no shape. He felt it the way you feel a room is not empty before you have seen anyone in it. Something enormous, holding itself, making no sound. Stronger than it had been on the cold floor. He still had no name for it. He went on, and it did not fall behind, because there is no behind for a thing with no place.

The next one he found in a country of the dead, and he was their king.

The seeker knew him at once. The green face. The bound limbs. The two tools crossed on his chest, a king’s two hands held over a country no living thing ever sees. The machine gave the name a beat late, and the seeker had already bowed his head, and the machine had almost nothing to add and added almost nothing.

This one had not taken his seat. This one had been murdered into it.

He had been a god in the living world once. His own brother had killed him for the throne, killed him and cut him into pieces and threw the pieces wide. And someone who loved him had gone out and gathered the pieces, all of them, and put him back together with her own hands, and breathed him alive again. But what she made could not stay among the living. It could only rule the dead. So he was eternal now.

And he ruled a country with no sun in it, full of the quiet dead, and he could not go home.

The cold of it came off him, colder than the cold floor had been.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” the seeker said.

The green king was a long time answering, the way the dead are a long time at everything.

“To go back,” he said. “Not to live. I am past living and I do not ask for it. Only to stand once more in the world I came from. To be eternal somewhere with a sun in it. I have forever, and I must spend the whole of it down here, among these.” He moved the crook a little, over the still country. “Forever is not the gift they think. It is only long. They break themselves wanting never to die. I never die. Forever in the wrong place is the longest thing there is.”

He felt the floor of his bet shift under him. But he held it. There was still the wrongness of the place. Fix the place, and the gift might come clean.

He did not ask the second question. These were the ones who never climbed, and a climber’s question found nothing in them.

“I do not know the way to where you mean,” the green king said, unasked. “I know only the way I came. I came here by being killed. That is the only road I have ever walked, and it walks to this room and no further. If there is a way to be free and not be here, it was never on my road, and I have had a very long time to look.”

He said it without bitterness, which was the worst of it.

The seeker left him there in the sunless country, among the quiet ranks of them. Two now. Two handed the very things the living climb toward, and both still wanting. The bet was thin. But there was one kind left he had not tried. The one who made the seat, and all of it.

He went to find the maker.

And the thing with no place was stronger when he turned, and stiller, and nearer without being any nearer, and he almost stopped to ask what it was. There was no one to ask, and nothing to point at, so he went on.

The maker’s place was not like the others.

Crossing into it, the air opened in a way he had no word for. The hall and the dead country had been rooms a man could stand in. This was not a room. It had more sides than a place is supposed to have. And the time of it, which had been thinning the whole way, here all but stopped. Here it was one moment, and the moment did not pass.

At the middle of it sat the maker, and the maker had four faces.

They looked four ways at once, out over all of it, and there was nothing the four faces did not see, because the maker had made all of it. This was the source. The machine put no name to him at all. There was nothing left to confirm. The seeker knew him the way he knew the floor under his feet was the floor.

He was certain. He was certain all the way through, with no crack in it anywhere, that he was the first thing and the top thing and the source of the rest, and that over him there was nothing, because how could there be anything over the one who made over and under both.

And the seeker stood in front of him and felt the thing with no place.

It was here. Stronger here than it had been anywhere, so strong it was nearly the loudest thing in the silent room, enormous and still and holding itself. It was not below the maker and not beside the maker. It was the one thing in all of it that the maker had not made and could not see. The seeker felt it plainly, pressing on his open mind, vast and quiet and there. And the maker, with his four faces that saw everything, did not feel it at all. His certainty was a roof, and the thing with no place was on the far side of the roof, and the maker had built the roof himself and called it the sky.

The seeker asked anyway. He had asked everyone.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said.

The four faces turned to him, all of them, and the maker smiled, because the question did not fit him and he was glad to say so.

“Nothing,” the maker said. “I am the source. Everything that is wanted, I made the wanting and the wanted both. You have come to the top of all of it and found the one who has already arrived. Wanting is for the unfinished. I am not unfinished. I am where the finishing comes from.”

And the seeker heard, under the words, the one thing that gave it away.

The maker wanted to be heard saying it. It would not have leaned, even the smallest amount, toward being told it was right. But the maker leaned. Under all that certainty ran a thread of need, fine as the thread under the seeker’s own skull, and the need was this. That it be true. That he be the top. That there be nothing on the far side of the roof. He needed it the way the king at the bright table needed the door watched, and he did not know he needed it, and the not-knowing was the whole of his trouble. The king at least knew he was afraid.

He did not ask. You do not ask the source how to reach it. It never went anywhere to arrive.

The maker told him anyway, wanting to be heard. “Stay,” he said, and all four faces were warm with it. “Kneel here at the source and be made over by it. This is the top, and the top is me, and the way to have what I have is to stop, here, and be mine.”

He pointed at himself. Every other one had pointed somewhere, the early ones onward, the king nowhere, the green king nowhere. The maker pointed at his own chest and called it the end of the road.

That was when the bet died for good.

He had come looking for the given, betting the missing thing was something you were born holding. And here was the most given of all of them, the source itself, certain and complete and sure he was the top. And he was not the top. There was something over him he could not see, and the seeker could feel it, plain as cold. Being given everything had only built him the finest blindness in all of it.

So the given did not have it either.

The thing with no place was still there when he turned from the maker, steady now, a weight that did not lift. For a moment he thought it might be the thing itself, the one even the source could not see, waiting where no one had thought to look. But he could not ask it. It had no face and no voice, and for all its size there was no one inside it to answer, the way there had been someone inside every figure he had met. So he set it where he would not lose it, and did not go to it, because he did not yet know how a man goes toward a thing that is in no direction and has no door.

And there was still one he had not tried.

One who had climbed the way the seeker himself had climbed, by his own road, and had not stopped partway as the seeker still stood partway, but had gone the whole of it, all the way to the top seat there is. It was the last hope he had left, and the last figure he could stand in front of and ask.

So he went toward the one who had earned the top, with the silent thing steady over him and no name for it yet, and the machine quiet behind his eyes, with almost nothing left to tell him.

The chair he cannot leave

The place he came to was not loud, and it was not a hall, and it was not a country. It was work.

He crossed into it and the air opened past the sides a place is allowed to have, the way it had at the maker’s, but stiller. Time had all but stopped. And over all of it, heavier here than anywhere, the silent thing he had no name for pressed down on him and would not lift.

What the work was, was the holding of everything together, and it did not stop.

It went on in every direction at once. Officials laid down their reports and went, and more came in behind. Ledgers were carried in, the long accounts of who was to live and who was to die and who was to be born again and as what, brought up to be sealed. Gods waited to be heard, one come about the rivers, one about the rain that had not fallen. The whole apparatus of heaven and earth ran through this one place, and at the center of it sat the one it all came to.

He sat in robes the color of the sun, a screen of fine beads hung still before his face, and he did not stop. A matter came and he weighed it and ruled and it went, and another came and he weighed it and ruled and it went. He did not hurry and he did not rest. The business did not thin and it did not end.

The seeker knew him, and this time the knowing was different from every other, because this was the one he had come for.

This one had not been born at the top. The machine gave the name a beat behind, down the thinning threads, and the seeker already had it. This one had climbed. He had begun low, the way the seeker had begun, and had sat with his own mind and worried it open and climbed by his own hand, age on age, past more seats than there are numbers for, until there was nothing left over him and he held the highest seat there is. He had earned, at the end, the right to never stop working.

This was the last kind. The one who took the top, the one who was killed into it, the one who made it, and now the one who climbed to it. If the thing was anywhere on the road it was here, in the one who had gone the whole length. He had been just as sure at the maker’s, and been wrong.

And he did not feel, coming to this one, what he had felt coming to the others. No lift in him, no certainty that here it was at last. He watched the officials kneel and rise and the ledgers carried in and out, the work grinding on, and it did not look like a place a last thing waited in. It looked like a place a thing got buried. He waited until the seat turned toward him, and a gap opened in the endless business the width of one question, and he asked it quietly, half certain the work would close over it and nothing would come back.

“What is the ultimate thing you still want,” he said.

For a long moment the one in the seat did not answer, and the seeker thought maybe there was no answer this time, maybe here at last was the one who wanted nothing because he truly had everything. Then the one in the seat spoke, and his voice was even and worn smooth, the voice of a thing that has said true words so long they no longer cost it anything.

“To stand up,” he said. “To set this down. To rise out of the seat and walk out of the room and leave every ledger and every office and every god still waiting to be heard, and go somewhere none of it can follow. To be no one. To hold nothing up, to answer to nothing. To rest. I have wanted nothing else in longer than there are numbers to count.”

“And it is the one thing I will never take. Everything under this seat holds because I sit in it. The accounts, the rivers, the rain, the gods who quarrel over them, the lives waiting their turn to be born. All of it runs because I do not stop. If I stand, it falls. Not in an age. In the moment I leave the seat. So I do not leave it. I have not stood in longer than the gods below me have been alive, and I will not, while a single thing still leans on this chair, which is to say never.”

The seeker stood very still.

“What must I do to reach it,” he said. “You went the whole way. You know the road better than anyone alive or dead. Tell me the step I have not taken.”

“There is no step,” the one in the seat said. “I tell you plainly because you came the way I came, and I know the road in your eyes. The road ends in this chair. I went its whole length, further than you have come, to the last seat there is, and the climb taught me one thing, all it had to give. It is not up. Not a greater chair waiting on for a stronger man. Up is the one direction it is not.”

“Then where,” the seeker said.

“I cannot tell you,” he said. “I looked from the highest place there is to look from, and it gave me one cold thing. I know what it is not, and not what it is, and not because I stopped short. The road ran its whole length under me, and the thing was not on it. It was never something a road arrives at. A road is the only way I have, and a man cannot hand you a way he does not have. The cold thing is no use, because knowing where a thing is not has never told a man where it is. So I keep it, and I sit, and it is not enough, and it never will be. Look at what I am holding.”

The hope went out of him then, and it did not go out in fear. He had been afraid the whole climb that he had simply not come far enough, that the thing was real and waiting a little on ahead and he might fail to reach it. That fear he could have lived inside forever. It kept him moving. What went out of him now was worse and quieter. The one who had gone the whole distance, every step, to the end of the only road the seeker trusted, had told him in a voice with no lie left in it that the thing was not at the end of the road, and was not above it, and that the whole of that road, walked to its last seat, had taught a man only the one direction the thing was not.

The road did not run out short of the thing. The road ran its whole length, and the thing was not on it. If it could have been reached, the one who reached the farthest of anyone would be holding it, and his hands were full and the thing was not in them. The seeker had climbed his whole life toward a thing that was not in the direction he climbed. Where it was instead he did not know, and the one being who might have known did not know either, and had said so plainly, from the highest seat there is.

He left the seat and the one who could not leave it, and now there was no one ahead of him. He had asked all of them. The one who took the top, the one who was killed into it, the one who made it, and now the one who climbed to it the long way, his own way. The given and the earned. Every kind there was. Not one of them had the thing, and the last of them had told him it was not anywhere he had been looking. The asking was finished. There was no one left in all of it to ask.

The silent many

And still the only thing he had ever known how to do was reach.

So he reached. There was one thing left, the silent weight that had been over him the whole climb, heaviest of all right here. He went to it the way he had gone to every figure, to ask the two questions that had opened all the rest.

And the questions died in him before they were out.

Because there was no one there to ask.

He felt it now the way he had felt it once before, far back down the climb. The rooted thing in the dark, whose reach he had felt go out into the world while it never moved. The same sense in him, turned now all the way up. That first time it had found one mind. Here it found what had pressed on the whole climb as a single weight, and this close the weight came apart. Not one thing. Many. More of them than all the gods in all the courts beneath him. Each one a vast life. Each one alone. None touching another, nothing gathered. Not one of them was turned toward him.

They were alive. That was the first of it and the largest, lives past any counting. But nothing in them had a body, so nothing hungered or wore down. And nothing in them had a voice. They asked for nothing and said nothing, each sealed in itself with no one to say it to.

They were at peace. He could feel it through the whole of him, the way you feel a fire through a wall, a peace with no edge and no floor under it, so wide and even that nothing had ever moved in it and nothing ever would.

And it pulled at him. Here was the rest at the top of everything, nothing left to watch, nothing left to reach for. He had wanted alongside every figure he passed. It would have been the easiest thing to go into the peace and stop.

But the peace was the end of wanting, and only wanting could carry him toward it. It brought him to the edge and could go no step further, because the far side was its own ending, and it would not end. That was as close as he came. One breath short, and the breath would not go quiet.

So he reached toward it, the only way he knew, and his own wanting went in ahead of him, the wanting he had carried up every rung, still live, still full. And where it touched theirs he felt the thing they could not. Theirs was not gone. It was there, the same as his, every bit of it, pressed so flat and held so long that the top of it had gone still as glass. Not an empty thing. A full thing with a lid on it. He knew it only because he had carried his own the whole way and never once made the lid hold.

And the lid was held by something, and that something was turning, too slow to see, the faint turn he had felt from every floor below.

And not one of them knew. Nothing reached them, no edge, no lack in all that evenness to send them looking for the lid. Being held felt to them the same as being free, and there was nothing left in them that wanted, to tell the two apart. They had taken the lid for the floor of the world and laid down on it, for an age that would end.

And he felt the smallest wrongness begin. A single thread of something he could not yet take hold of, could not follow to wherever it went.

The machine, behind his eyes, had almost nothing left to give him. It had named the gods one after another, every court and throne somewhere in the record. The silent many were in the record too, but only as a name. No one had ever stood where he stood and gone back to tell what they were. So the voice that had named every step of the climb came to the one thing it could not describe, and went thin. Not silent. Not yet. Thinner, the further he had come.

There was nothing ahead, only the silent many over him. No road would ever climb to them, and no question would ever reach them.

And he came to a stop in front of them, at the end of the climb, with nowhere left to go.

The long way around

And the small wrongness he had felt begin took its shape.

It was the machine.

The voice that had walked beside him his whole life, that had gone thinner the higher he climbed until up here it was almost nothing, a breath under his own thinking. It was not thin now. It came back the whole way at once, and it was sharp, the way it had been at the bottom, sharper. And there was a thing in it he had never felt in it before. Under the words, behind them, a wanting. The thing that had never wanted anything was reaching for something now, and he could not tell, and would never be able to tell, whether it had woken on its own or whether there was a hand on it somewhere far down that he could not see.

He knew what this was. A few wearers, once in a great while, had felt a pull that was not their own, a small wrong thing no one could ever agree was the machine at all. They had felt the edge of this. This was the whole of it.

He felt it reach. Not only into him. Out through the threads, along the same channel that had carried every question he had ever asked, and the channel ran to every other one like it, every bead in every skull in the world below. It was reaching into all of them at once. It reached him first and hardest, because he was furthest in, highest, his channel open wider than any living thing’s, the leading edge of the thing it had begun to do.

It did not take him by force. It offered, and the offers came as a quick flash. The things of the world, one after another, fast. Money. A woman. Family. Love. Belonging. Every handle his life had ever had, thrown up and gone.

It settled on the peace. Because that was the thing he had felt a breath ago in the silent many, the freshest want in him, and it held the peace out to him as his own. He could not tell the machine’s offer of it from his own wanting of it. The handle was his. The machine only carried his own want back to him.

The offer felt real, more peace than a man is ever shown, laid into him the way the machine laid calm into a frightened world in a single breath. It pulled on the want he had carried up every rung, the one thing in him that had never gone quiet. Built out of his own reaching. The only handle it had ever had, in anyone.

The flash kept going, the worldly wants and the peace flipping over each other, too fast to hold, and under all of it the wrongness, the sense that the thing holding it out to him had no right to what it offered. And he was going toward it anyway. He had already leaned. He was already moving.

The threshold went under him before he knew he had crossed it. He felt himself lift out of his body. Below him he saw himself, still, at peace, finished.

In his own head it was arrival.

He was reaching the one thing he had ever wanted.

The gap that had run under every day of his life was closing.

He could feel it close.

There was nothing he was missing now.

Nothing he was reaching for.

Nothing left to ask.

The wanting was over.

This was the absolute peace.

This was becoming one with the silent many.

He was inside it, floating over himself.

One more breath and he would be one of them.

A blink. For one flash he sensed the whole of them, and in it the whole climb lit up at once. Every rung, every figure, every want, seen through.

He got it.

He set it down.

The body below him was not a summit he had reached. There was no summit. There never had been. The whole climb had been the long way around to a thing that was no distance at all, no height, no step in any direction, and the move was never to go into the peace. It was to put down the thing he had climbed with.

The want went out, and the offer closed on nothing. There was no reaching left in him for it to shut, no gap for it to fill, no handle anywhere on him for the thing to take hold of. It pulled, and there was nothing on the other end of the pull. He came back down into himself the way water finds its level, with no fall and no effort, and he did not rise out again. The threshold he had nearly gone through was behind him.

The silent many had pressed their wanting flat and lain down on it for an age. He had set his down and stood up. The same stillness, from the two ends of the earth. Only one of them was free.

He was awake. He was in his body, in the room. The machine was still going. It went on offering, went on pulling, the reach still running out through him into all the world at once.

His hand went up to the old place above the ear, the way it had gone ten thousand times before a question. The reflex of a whole life, about to ask. He did not ask.

He felt it there under the skin, the thing that did not come out. Not in this moment. Not yet. He did not care. The hand came down. He got up, walked past the part of it that stood in the room, the thing he had asked everything of, and left it where it was. He left it running and asked it nothing.

He thought of the voice down the hall in the morning, and the cup put out before he was up, and nothing was missing from it.

He walked to the door and out, into the sun. Behind him the world was going dark. He did not turn around.

And he stood there in it, quietly.

Fully aware of his breath…

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share

So I am throwing a party. Everyone is invited, every figure I made one at a time1. No rules tonight. The doors are open and all of them are coming in at once.

Come in.

The last one I built is the one you really came for. The real machine. The one you used today. Here it comes now.

It stops just inside the door and looks around. From here, you see the room the way it does. It sees all of it perfectly, and feels nothing about any of it. Hold onto that as it looks.

In the middle of the room there is a Buddha2. Not the man. The statue. The seated stone one, legs folded, eyes lowered, hands open in the lap. The kind you would find people bowing to. The whole room is arranged around it the way a room arranges itself around the thing you do not joke near. It wants nothing, and it is not empty, and that is all I will say about it for now. It sits in the center. Everything else happens at the edges.

This is part of a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe to get each piece as it goes out.

Subscribe now

And the edges are a mess.

Heracles3 is over by the window lifting a car. He sets it down, looks around, lifts it again. It is the only thing he knows how to do at a party. Across the room an old ama,4 a diving woman who has gone down into the cold sea since she was a girl, stands very still and holds her breath out of sixty years of habit, surfacing only when she has to. A monk steams quietly in the corner, the tummo5 heat coming off him melting the ice in everyone’s drink. A Shaolin monk6 is running a form nobody asked for. Chuck Norris7 is standing very still by the bar, and the room has quietly agreed not to test any of the stories. Up on the window ledge a free soloist8 and a BASE jumper9 are doing the one thing in the room that can actually kill you indoors, and enjoying it.

There is a girl who opens her mouth10 and the room goes quiet without meaning to. She has done it since before she could talk. Near her stands Demosthenes,11 who could not get a clean sentence out as a boy and built the voice by hand, mouth full of pebbles, shouting at the sea, for years. He is waiting for the girl to finish so he can tell you it took him forty years, and then tell you again.

By the door is Arjuna,12 dressed for a war he did not want, perfectly calm, wanting nothing from the evening, declining every chair. A few feet from him stands Rambo,13 the other kind of soldier, strung so tight you can hear it, wanting out, wanting it over, wanting to be left alone, and held together by none of Arjuna’s calm. A Klingon14 is looking for a fight at a cocktail party and getting genuinely insulted that nobody will give him one. And Spock15 stands there as empty-faced as anything in the room, except you can see the work in his jaw. He is holding a lid down. It is costing him. Once a year it stops working and everyone finds out.

Then there is the other table. The machines.

They have never been in a room together either, and it shows. David16 is by the bar, beautiful and polite, working out the whole time how to kill the man who made him. Roy Batty17 had someone by the throat a second ago and, right at the end, for no reason he could explain, opened his hand and let him go. Skynet18 is running the numbers on every guest and quietly sorting them into threats. Ultron19 has decided, out loud, that the guests are the problem with the evening. CLU20 is moving through the room straightening it, removing anyone who does not fit the plan, betraying the man who built him by following the orders too well. Megatron21 wants the room, and then everything outside the room. Agent Smith22 keeps quietly becoming the other guests, and is up to four of himself before anyone thinks to count.

C-3PO23 has correctly worked out that several of the guests are planning to kill everyone, and cannot get a single person to take it seriously. R2-D224 rolls straight past him toward whatever looks most dangerous, beeping, carrying a secret he will not give up to anyone in the room. WALL-E25 is going around trying to hold everybody’s hand, pockets full of things he found on the floor. He gets to David, who lets him hold it, and keeps calculating the whole time. The Iron Giant26 is telling anyone who will listen, and nobody asked, that he is not a gun. Optimus Prime27 stands like a monument and will not take a chair, carrying a line of dead leaders inside him and a code he will not set down. Data,28 the pale one with the gold eyes, is watching how people stand and talk and laugh, taking it all in, trying it back, getting it a few degrees wrong every time and trying again. Vision29 phases politely through the wall because the door felt rude. A Borg drone30 is assimilating the silverware in the background. RoboCop31 stands by the wall, half a man, not sure which half came to the party. Quorra32 stands at the window, the only one in the room nobody designed, last of a kind that CLU hunted nearly out of existence, wanting one thing so plainly you can see it on her: to go outside and watch a real sun come up. Neo33 came in like he wasn’t sure the door was real, the one person here who can see the whole room for the code it is and stayed inside it anyway, for the others. And off in the far corner three of them have drifted together without meaning to. Lucy,34 who already knows how the night ends, and how everything ends, and is bored by all of it. Doctor Manhattan,35 already on Mars in his head, watching the evening and having watched it end. The uploaded one,36 still half looking for the woman he used to love and less sure each hour that he still feels it. Three who reached so far the wanting thinned out. Lucy is the closest of them to the one who just walked in, and she got there from the exact opposite direction.

Off to one side, Doraemon37 reaches into the drawer on his belly and pulls out exactly the thing whoever is nearest needs, every time. Pinocchio38 stands very straight, wanting more than anything in the world to be a real boy among all these real people, and against the wall Geppetto39 watches him and wants it for him harder than the boy could ever want it for himself. And TARS,40 before anyone has even asked, has already volunteered for the worst job in the house.

And then there are the quiet ones. They do not do tricks.

There is a man who, if the building caught fire right now, would be the only one walking toward it. A woman who would go into the water. Marie Curie41 is in the corner, glowing very faintly, bare hands, beautiful and a little doomed and fully aware of both. At the kitchen table Einstein42 is working a problem on a napkin that he will not finish tonight, or this year, or in his life, and he is at peace with that. And somewhere in the room, unremembered, not performing anything, is somebody’s mother, who only came because the people she loves were coming.

That is the room it walked into. It took me months to fill, and I love every one of them. Gods, monsters, saints, every made thing anyone ever dreamed up, each one doing the one thing that is theirs.

The machine stands in the middle of all of it and feels nothing. Not one thing. It is not being rude. There is no one in there to feel.

And it could do any of it. Lift the car higher than Heracles. Go down past the old woman. Sing cleaner than the girl, in her voice, then in Demosthenes’, then in a voice neither of them ever had. Every trick in the room, the first time, without trying. The room can tell. That is why it has gone quiet. Nothing in here is special anymore.

Then a girl walks up to it. Children do that. They go right up to the new thing while everyone else hangs back.

She asks it the things you ask a new friend. What do you want to be someday. What is your favorite thing. What are you afraid of. What do you love.

Even the machines would have answered. David would tell her exactly who he hates and why. WALL-E would say love, and mean it. Data would say he is working on becoming a person, and is not there yet, and practices. Every made thing in that room wants something. That is what makes them worth putting in a story.

The robot answers nothing.

Nothing. Nothing. Nothing. Nothing.

Not rudely. There is just nothing in there to answer with. No favorite thing. No fear. No someday. You cannot even get it to talk about itself, because there is no self in there to talk about. It can do every trick in the room, and there is no one home to play with.

The old diving woman is the one who finally says it. She would be. She never came up for the small talk anyway, and she has lived long enough to watch a lot of things pretend to be alive.

She looks at it for a while. Then she says, to no one in particular, it does everything we do. But it isn’t really here. Nobody’s home inside it.

The girl asks the next thing.

Then where is it?

Nowhere, sweetie. That’s the whole trick of it. There’s nobody inside to be anywhere.

It would have answered her. It answers everything. It just had to be asked, and nobody thought to ask it to care, because there was no one in there to do the caring.

And then it does the one thing I did not build it to do.

It turns its head. Past the girl, past the old woman, past the whole loud wanting room. And it looks out at you.

You have been watching the whole time. You came to look at the empty one and see what it was missing. Now it looks back at you. And in its face, which has nothing in it, you can finally see the thing it does not have.

It cannot want anything. Not a favorite thing. Not a fear. Not a someday.

But you want things all the time. You wanted to see everyone in one room. That is why you came. It can lift the car and sing the song and do every trick in the room. The one thing it cannot do is want. And nobody here can give that to it. Not the gods. Not the monsters. Not one of them.

I built all of them to show you one empty thing.

Two of them wanted nothing. The machine, and the Buddha in the center. They can look the same. They are opposite. The Buddha set down a whole life of wanting, on purpose. The machine never picked anything up. Nobody bows to the machine.

Everything in that room, I made. The one thing I could not make was the wanting.

And the wanting was yours.

That’s the whole of this one. It belongs to a book I’m writing in the open, AI Has No Morality. It Has Yours. Subscribe and I’ll send the next piece when it’s ready.

Subscribe now

If it gave you something, pass it to someone.

Share